b-yond-infinite-network/jest-cucumber-fusion

Write cucumber test the natural way but still have them part of a jest run (including coverage)

jest-cucumber-fusion's Issues

Background support

Hi,

Gherkin Background keyword is very useful for avoiding repeating Given steps in features. It is supported in jest-cucumber. Any luck adding to jest-cucumber-fusion?

Thank you.

[Question] Can I execute one scenario only?

Scenario

I have a feature with one or more scenarios (let's call them X, Y an Z)
I'm developing a test suite
I want to add a new scenario: W
I want to execute only scenario W for faster development cycle

Problem

There's actually no way to tell jest to only run scenario W but temporary removing X, Y and Z from the feature file.

Basically, I'm missing the concept of scenario in my tests code. Using regular jest's describe I can isolate test cases during development (and even debug it). I'm looking for the same behaviour, but using cucumber-like test definitions.

Is it even possible?

[Request] Outline Scenario Title Variables

Hi, thank you for the great library. Could you please add real values into the log messages of the outline scenarios?

Feature File:

Log:

Thank You

Autopublishing in npmjs is not working

The latest version on https://www.npmjs.com/ is 0.8.1 which is published 2 years ago.
It seems autopublishing as result of merge pull request is not working.
Is it possible to fix this problem and upload a new version in npmjs

Eugene...

language support

I'm trying to add tests in another language (than english) but this doesn't work.
I dived in this problem and came to the conclusion that this should be fixed in jest-cucumber: bencompton/jest-cucumber#107

Any thoughts?

Possibility of using semantic release ?

Describe the feature you'd like:

I would like to add semantic release (the way we are using for infinity-ui-lib. So the process for generating releases, change log is fully automated.

If this is something that you think will work, i can do a PR.

Can't use Regex StepDef With Table

Hi,
I am able to successfully use capture groups in regex stepdefs and separately gherkin tables in a different step def, but I can not use both in the same step def. This is something that is available in jest-cucumber, and so it's something I think should be supported here.

When I try the step def below, only the first parameter is given a value.

Then(/^a (\d+) result is returned from the endpoint&/, ((httpCode_CucumberInput: string, result_CucumberInput: string) => {
   ...
}))

Jest-cucumber doesn't allow a mix of more then 1 variable and 1 outline variable on the same steps

When we try something like this:

Scenario Outline: whatever Scenario
    When some <variable> is also used with 'another_variable'
     Then ....
     ....
     Example Outline:
     |   variable   |
     |     value1    |
     |     value2    |

It seem that the regexp priority in jest-cucumber is wrong when there's more than 1 entity in the sentence

Scenario examples are incorrectly parsed when using in step with tables

When Scenario Outline contains step with RegExp in Definition and using example value in Table at the same time then during execution example value is not substituted in step.
For example:

Scenario Outline: <description>
  Given Some step with <exampleValue> and use table:
     | field     | value          |
     | SomeField | <exampleValue> |

Examples:
    | exampleValue |
    | myValue      |

then during the execution scenario step contains: { field: 'SomeField', value: '<exampleValue>'} instead of { field: 'SomeField', value: 'myValue'}

Cucumber fusion for multiple feature files in Step definition

Currently fusion keyword in stepdefinition file is to include only 1 feature. Can we include all the feature files in stepdefinitions file.

Complex array reg exp do not work

Trying to use an array definition regex fails: ([(?: \d+(?: |, |,))+])

We should be able to do

 Scenario: Folding ourselves in 2D
    Given I am Elon Musk attempting to launch a rocket into space
    And  my position in 2D space is [ 0, 2 ]
    When I launch the rocket
    Then the rocket should end up in space

[Question] Multiple scenarios

First of all, nice stuff. I've been using BDD and cucumber for 5 years now and am a huge fan of the approach.

So, do you support multi-scenario feature files? if yes, what's the syntax?
Thanks.

Add support for jest-cucumber 3.0.0

jest-cucumber 2.0.0 does not support updated Gherkin syntax

Including Rule

Error parsing feature Gherkin: Parser errors:
    (34:5): expected: #EOF, #TableRow, #DocStringSeparator, #StepLine, #TagLine, #ScenarioLine, #ScenarioOutlineLine, #Comment, #Empty, got 'Rule: User must authenticate'

RegEx With Databale

Hello,
Happy New Year !

I added the possibility of having a sentence can be matched with regEx when it is a datatable.
It is useful in my project to have only one parameterizable sentence example:

[...]
Then I should see the following 2 todos in my list:
      | TaskName      | Priority |
      | Watch the cat | high     |
      | Registration  | high     |

and another Scanario

[...]
Then I should see the following 3 todos in my list:
      | TaskName      | Priority |
      | Watch the cat | high     |
      | Registration  | high     |
      | Journal       | high     |

It allows me to have only 1 sentence

Then(/^I should see the following (\d) todos in my list:$/, (param1, table) => {
   expect(table[0].TaskName).toBe('Watch the cat')
})

The datatable should always be the last parameter.

PR is Here: #18 (comment)

Non-outline expression bracket-enclosed (<>) with multiple words separated by a space

For standard scenario (non-outline) like this:

Feature: Rocket Launching

  Scenario: Launching a SpaceX rocket
    Given I am Elon Musk attempting to launch a rocket into space
    When I launch the '<personal rocket>'
    Then the rocket should end up in space
    And the booster(s) should land back on the launch pad
    But nobody should doubt me ever again

The 2d steps will be broken and fail execution everytime.!

Expression written with a potential value in their text will fail with the variable undefined

A tricky one:

Scenario: Testing simple inception
    Given my account name is 'a'
    When I get an new account name 'name' with a type Test from my old account named 'a'
    Then my account name should be "name" and have a type Test

Ability to find and load all feature files and to define steps independently from feature file paths

Similarly to https://github.com/TheBrainFamily/cypress-cucumber-preprocessor and https://github.com/sjmeverett/gherkin-jest , I would like to have the capability of loading all features files by the testing framework, as well as the ability of reusing steps across features so they only need to be implemented once.

This library however, makes feature files dependent on where they come from. Because we export our features from an bug tracking system from time to time, I find it inconvenient that I have to hardcode the feature file paths.