bhupesh-v/areyouok

A fast and easy to use URL health checker ⛑️ Keep your links healthy during tough times (Out of box support for GitHub Actions)

wassup nerds 🖖

Software Craftsman and Tech Writer living in New Delhi, India. I like to build stuff using Go, Python & Bash.

• I am a Community Lead at r/developersIndia (Home for more than 400K techies. 🚀)
• In my free time, I am probably sleeping or reading something online.
• I write sometimes, you can read some of my work below 👇

---

Recent Writeups

Blogs How I reduced the size of my very first published docker image by 40% - A lesson in dockerizing shell scripts Why is the Internet losing its innocence - going from collaboration to hate? If I could change one thing about tech interviews Writing like a pro with vale & neovim

TIL Interference theory Einstellung effect Mentoring Net Promoter Score (NPS)

Newsletter Reflections from my visit to GopherCon India 2023 10 key lessons from my first engineering job One secret tip for first-time OSS contributors. Shh! 🤫 don't tell anyone else Why it's OK to abandon your side projects 😉

Getting bored? have a meme

thatWillBeAnImportantLesson

ℹ️ Source [ Powered By 🔥 Memer Action ]

Hire Me

• Know more about how we can collaborate professionally

areyouok's Issues

socket: too many open files

Describe the bug
there is a limit to how many file descriptors can be open at a time.
See https://stackoverflow.com/questions/32325343/go-tcp-too-many-open-files-debug

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

1. Run Areyouok on file with greater than 200 links (For e.g awesome-go README)
2. A lot of URLs are reported as above error

Expected behavior
All URLs should be correctly fetched

Screenshots
If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem.

Desktop (please complete the following information):

• OS: [e.g. Windows 10]
• areyouok version: [latest]

Additional context
Use buffered channels, and add a limit for it (use ulimit -n)

UTF Icons don't show up in HTML report

Describe the bug
UTF icons don't show up in the generated HTML report.

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

1. Run the binary
2. Serve the generated HTML report.
3. No fancy icons 😢

Expected behavior
Need muh UTF icons.

Screenshots

Desktop (please complete the following information):

• OS: Windows
• Browser: N/A
• Version: N/A

Smartphone (please complete the following information):

• Device: N/A
• OS: N/A
• Browser: N/A
• Version: N/A

Additional context
N/A

Throws a `999` Status Error Code for LinkedIn links

Describe the bug
While checking for broken links, areyouok throws a 999 Error Status code for URLs pointing towards LinkedIn.

EDIT: Just found out, even URLs pointing towards Twitter returns a 404 Not Found Error. Here's an example issue thread for reference.

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

1. Create an example README.md file with the a link to a LinkedIn profile.
2. Run areyouok against the newly created README.md file (which contains the LinkedIn URL).
3. Check the generated report for a 999 Error Status Code.

Expected behavior
areyouok should've returned a 200 OK Status Code.

Screenshots

Desktop (please complete the following information):

• OS: Ubuntu 20.04
• areyouok version: v1.1.0 built on (26 Jan 2021)

Modularise code

Right now the logic for areyouok contains in one single big file. It would be nice to have some structure in place.
We can follow the 12 factor app pattern here

fix go automated tests

Right now the go setup action is failing to install the latest unstable release 1.16

the issue seems to be in the version label not being understood

areyouok/.github/workflows/go.yml

Lines 16 to 20 in c1b22b7

	- name: Set up Go
	uses: actions/setup-go@v2
	with:
	stable: 'false'
	go-version: '1.16-beta1'

See actions/setup-go#63

support for line numbers in github & html report format

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Right now the links appear in list of tables for the GitHub report format.
It would be nice if we can link to the exact line number where the link exists.

Describe the solution you'd like
A new parser kinda thing will be required to find the line numbers of exact regexp matches. Its an interesting and fun problem to solve