Relations between topics

[buildingsmart]

Relations between topics

[linhard]

I made a proposal to be to discussed in the recently uploaded markup.xsd

[berlotti]

This is definitely one of the most important missing features right now.
Other use cases that are common:

• An issue is closed, but another one created because the project team decided the issue will be solved in a different way (a clash is closed without solving the clash, because it is decided to change the design)
• Two issues are merged into one (two are closed, but refered to a new one with a different solution direction)
• and basically all known use cases in source code issue management systems that make this feature so logic that I strongly suggest to implement it.

[ErikPijnenburg]

I agree with berlotti. Related Topic is needed. Adding the direction or parent-child can make it easier to visualize.
I see in the markup also a TopicType in the RelatedTopic. What's that for? It should not have TopicType of the referred topic here causing superfluous info.

[linhard]

Example:
A topic with type "PfV" could have several related Topics; lets say 2 Clashes and 1 Opening. A filter then could be (in words) "Get all clashes (topics) which lead to that PfV.

[ErikPijnenburg]

I understand the related topics. But why the TopicType in the relation?
Above question can also be queried without that redundant info by looking to TopicType of referred topics.

[linhard]

Yes, of course !
I just removed from markup.xsd