Open Source BCF client

[buildingsmart]

Open Source BCF client

[pasi-paasiala]

Hi Matteo,

Are you supporting BCF 2.0 also?

[teocomi]

@pasi-paasiala yes it is supporting BCF 2.0 in the form of multiple viewpoints per issue, although not other functionalities as BimSnippet, DocumentReference, RelatedTopics (yet)...

[DuncanLithgow]

Great move Matteo!

Cheers Duncan

Sendt fra min vanilla Android mobil
On Jul 29, 2015 13:39, "Matteo Cominetti" [email protected] wrote:

@pasi-paasiala https://github.com/pasi-paasiala yes it is supporting
BCF 2.0 in the form of multiple viewpoints per issue, although not other
functionalities as BimSnippet, DocumentReference, RelatedTopics (yet)...

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#63 (comment)
.

[gschleusner]

@teocomi I just posted #67 and wonder if you have any interested in supporting a SQLite back end. We build it so we could easily merge, split, update filter, search and sort multiple bcfs. We have a front end to upload and sort the issues but haven't gone further yet. It would be great in between step for those that can't use web services but want some greater capabilities. We built the schema so we could actually also store files "snippits" directly in the database. What we'd really like to see is being able to store 3D pdfs along with issues that require them. So instead of just a 2D view on some issues you'd get a 3d PDF viewer. ...

Let me know if this is of interest.

[teocomi]

This is interesting @gschleusner , if you could share a db dump and that basic app to push up the bcf I can look into implementing it...

[gschleusner]

drop me an email greg . schleusner at hok dot com and I will send get you the installer

[linhard]

• how about putting a link to your BCF client into the official documentation

[teocomi]

Sounds good for me @linhard

[linhard]

#89

[DuncanLithgow]

In my opinion it is not appropriate to mention specific implementations in
the documentation without first starting a software validation program.
Without a validation program any, possibly very poor, application of the
BCF format can reasonably ask to be included in such a list.
I think it is better to help maintain a list like one on Wikipedia. I have
been meaning to start one and will try and prioritize this as the
notability of BCF is increasing.

Sendt fra min vanilla Android mobil

On Jul 21, 2016 21:37, "Matteo Cominetti" [email protected] wrote:

Sounds good for me @linhard https://github.com/linhard

—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#63 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADEt9IM4vKCxRUPGoRFfYKDklvT-w6hXks5qX8qTgaJpZM4Fh54y
.

[GeorgDangl]

That sounds good, @DuncanLithgow . Maybe you could share your list and could maintain it here in the GitHub Wiki?

I'd like to keep the BCFier reference, however, since it's the first (?) open source implementation for BCFv2. So it's a good starting point for someone starting with BCF.

[DuncanLithgow]

I notice that buildingsmart-tech refers to Open BIM Collaboration Format (
http://www.buildingsmart-tech.org/specifications/bcf-releases)

Is that the more correct name?

2016-07-25 8:38 GMT+02:00 Georg Dangl [email protected]:

That sounds good, @DuncanLithgow https://github.com/DuncanLithgow .
Maybe you could share your list and could maintain it here in the GitHub
Wiki?

I'd like to keep the BCFier reference, however, since it's the first (?)
open source implementation for BCFv2. So it's a good starting point for
someone starting with BCF.

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#63 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADEt9ERXjE8iAdBLWZYeTerDtTZmbFg7ks5qZFn2gaJpZM4Fh54y
.

With or without religion, good people can behave well and bad people can do
evil; but for good people to do evil — that takes religion.

Steven Weinberg