Giter Site home page Giter Site logo

Comments (7)

cezarypiatek avatar cezarypiatek commented on May 16, 2024

I'm not sure what's the expected behavior of this type of method. Could you provide a sample implementation?

from mappinggenerator.

p3t3rix avatar p3t3rix commented on May 16, 2024
   public MyDest Map(MySource source, MyDest target)
        {
            target.Foo = source.Foo;
            target.Bar = source.Bar;
            target.Baz = source.Baz;
            return target;
        }

Basically the same as the generated mapping for this signature

   public void Update(MySource source, MyDest target);

The reason why it would be nice to have is that the signature with return-value can be chained, used as input-parameter, etc.

from mappinggenerator.

cezarypiatek avatar cezarypiatek commented on May 16, 2024

I'm not convinced about this idea. This kind of method is very confusing. When I see that kind of signature I always need to check the implementation because it's very hard to figure out what the expected outcome should be. Besides, method chaining makes the debugging very hard. Adding this kind of feature to MappingGenerator would support bad programming practices.

from mappinggenerator.

p3t3rix avatar p3t3rix commented on May 16, 2024

I just wanted to recreate a seamless drop in implementation for an API that already exists that way in automapper. Not really agreeing on the bad code aspect here but ok, fair enough.

from mappinggenerator.

cezarypiatek avatar cezarypiatek commented on May 16, 2024

Just out of pure curiosity, could you provide a real-life example of chaining mapping methods?

from mappinggenerator.

p3t3rix avatar p3t3rix commented on May 16, 2024

It's less the chaining and more the return type that is useful, for example you have your ApiController and you can call

Ok(_mapper.Map(sourceBo, targetDto); 

But i guess i can work around the limitation by adapting my BaseMapper a bit. Thanks for your time.

from mappinggenerator.

cezarypiatek avatar cezarypiatek commented on May 16, 2024

I would suggest naming mapping method that updates the second parameter just Update:

public void Update(MySource source, MyDest target)
{
	target.Foo = source.Foo;
	target.Bar = source.Bar;
	target.Baz = source.Baz;
}

and split the usage into two separrated lines (do not invoke method inside the parameter):

_mapper.Map(sourceBo, targetDto);
Ok(targetDto); 

In that way, your code will be more readable and easier to understand.

from mappinggenerator.

Related Issues (20)

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.