GCC version in Makefile

[qian-gu]

GCC version in Makefile

[agrobman]

this warning means that that make can't run RISCV GCC. Or you don't have GCC installed or it's name isn't riscv64-unknown-elf-gcc or it is not in the search path. You need to have the RISCV tools, supporting multilib option.
(GCC can be built to support various RISCV extensions both 32 and 64 bit versions. Makefile calls the GCC with appropriate ISA switches, suitable for EH1 .
You can use the gcc with different prefix , supplying GCC_PREFIX= to the make command.

[qian-gu]

this warning means that that make can't run RISCV GCC. Or you don't have GCC installed or it's name isn't riscv64-unknown-elf-gcc or it is not in the search path. You need to have the RISCV tools, supporting multilib option.
(GCC can be built to support various RISCV extensions both 32 and 64 bit versions. Makefile calls the GCC with appropriate ISA switches, suitable for EH1 .
You can use the gcc with different prefix , supplying GCC_PREFIX= to the make command.

I did have compiled RV32GC GCC and added it to my path in .zshrc file,

./configure --prefix=/opt/rv32gc  --with-arch=rv32gc --with-abi=ilp32d
make

The result is riscv32-unknow-elf-gcc. My question is that the 64bit version gcc is not compatible with any RV32 core, so it should be

GCC_PREFIX=riscv32-unknow-elf

in the makefile.

By the way, does it is mandatory to supporting multilib option?

[agrobman]

Nothing is mandatory - you are using this code with no any guarantee ( read license statements)- it's open source project and you are getting it for free. But we advice to build 64 bit multilib RISCV tools version, which can be used with any flavor of RISCV processor. Regardless the said, you can modify everything in your local DB.

[qian-gu]

I got it. Although the compiled result of multilib version gcc starts with prefix riscv64-unknow-elf, but it does support any RV32 or RV64 cores by using different -march, -abi options, so there are not any compatible problems. Thanks for your explanation.