[Request] Provide a param that can set the web context root path of cryostat-web

[mircea-lemnaru-aera]

[Request] Provide a param that can set the web context root path of cryostat-web

[andrewazores]

Hi @mircea-lemnaru-aera , thanks for the report and suggestion. I think this will be fixed in our 3.0 release next year as a side effect of some other deeper changes, but that is a long way away from being released. In the meantime I'll try to implement something that works for the existing 2.x series. It will be too late to make it into the 2.4.0 release, but perhaps this can be in 2.4.1.

[mircea-lemnaru-aera]

@andrewazores sorry , I missed the message. We are using the operator to deploy the cryostat instance as its easier that way. Nice approach with <base href="./"> didn't know that's possible.

Thanks

[andrewazores]

@mircea-lemnaru-aera are you using the Cryostat Operator to help deploy and manage this instance, or are you doing it some other way? I'm wondering if it's enough to put a configuration parameter on just the Cryostat container here, or if this also needs to be configurable through the Cryostat Operator's CRs. I think for simplicity's sake and to target this as a bugfix for a 2.4.1 release I would prefer to keep the change contained to just the one configuration parameter on this container (maybe with a small patch for cryostat-web as well). If it needs to trickle through to configuration on the Operator and Helm chart as well then it's a bit of a bigger scope and might not be suitable for a bugfix update.

[andrewazores]

@mircea-lemnaru-aera would you be able to test that <base href="./"> change and verify that it works for your case? I think you will still run into the in-app "Not Found" page that I mentioned on that PR, but that seems more like a relatively minor annoyance and should at least unblock you.

Let me know if you need any help getting a container image with that change included, or if you need help with getting the Operator to deploy that. My testing reverse proxy setup is much more primitive than yours so I'm not 100% satisfied that I have solved this case for you :-)

[mircea-lemnaru-aera]

@andrewazores I again missed the notifications. There seems to be something wrong with my filter settings in gmail. Thanks for taking care of this.
I see that this is planned for 2.4.1 release. Any idea when that will be available to test via the operator ?

Thanks

[andrewazores]

@mircea-lemnaru-aera no worries!

We don't have a firm timeline for 2.4.1 release yet but our initial estimate would be roughly March.

If you're comfortable using a development image then those are already available: https://quay.io/repository/cryostat/cryostat?tab=tags (2.4.1-snapshot). If you try deploying a development build of the Operator then it will deploy that 2.4.1-snapshot Cryostat image for you. Let us know if you need any help getting that running!