I have some questions about em1 and em2.

[daniilidis-group]

I have some questions about em1 and em2.

[alexzzhu]

ef.templated_decimated is a boolean to indicated whether the template has undergone sphere decimation. Do you mean ef.prev_shifted_points? In that case, there is the option to use this as the template for em1 to simplify the flow estimation step.

I'm not sure what you mean by the second question, but the transformation is defined as x' = A*(x-xdot * dt), so the points are time shifted, and then the affine transformation is applied.

[neulky]

Thank you Alex,
I'm Sorry, I didn't express my questions clearly.
In my first question, I mean that this system defines two templates 'ef.prev_shifted_points' and 'ef.template_points'. Now I understand using the template 'ef.prev_shifted_points' instead of 'ef.template_points' for em1 is simplifying the flow estimation step.
In my second question, In the em2_affine.m,Line 230:
time_shifted_points = bsxfun(@minus, events(1:2, :), feature_pos + flow * dt) + bsxfun(@times, flow, (events(3, end) - events(3, :)));
Can I replace the above codes as following?
time_shifted_points = bsxfun(@minus, events(1:2, :), feature_pos - pos_shift + flow * dt) + bsxfun(@times, flow, (events(3, end) - events(3, :)));
The change here is to replace feature_pos with feature_pos - pos_shift. I think this need to use the feature position after affine warping.

[alexzzhu]

Hmm I think you're right... I think the best way would be to replace feature_pos with feature_pos_out there. Have you tested this locally, does the tracking still work? I'm out of the office for the week so will have to check next week.

[neulky]

Thank you for your help. Yes, I replace feature_pos with feature_pos_out, the tracking still works.But by observing the results, I don't know the tracking accuracy is improving or not.