How can we make the best use of non-detections and noisy data when we don't believe the uncertainty or upper limit informaiton being reported by the data provider?
- Nat Butler (ASU)
- Dan Foreman-Mackey (NYU)
- David W. Hogg (NYU)
- James Long (Berkeley)
- Joey Richards (Berkeley)
Copyright 2011, 2012 the authors. All rights reserved.
-
mira_sims
: light curves for simulated mira variables. LCs are of ASAS 235627-4947.2 with varying fractions of the original flux, e.g.,1, 0.5, 0.25, 0.01
-
miras
: ASAS light curves for the 1720 mira candidates, with non-detections denoted with29.999
-
mira_features.dat
: features for 1720 mira candidates, including all Lomb-Scargle and non-LS features -
rrl
: ASAS light curves for the 1029 RR Lyrae, FM candidates, with non-detections denoted with29.999
-
rrl_features.dat
: features for 1029 RR Lyrae, FM candidates, including all Lomb-Scargle and non-LS features.
mira_simulated.pdf
: simulated mira light curve with different flux fractions
the code
-
Makefile
: file to compile Hogg's original note -
censored_catalog.tex
: tex for Hogg's original note -
ms.tex
: manuscript tex file -
non_detect.bib
: manuscriptbib
file -
apj.bst
: needed forms.tex
to compile