ddd-crew/context-mapping

context-mapping's Issues

Customer --> Supplier misleading arrow?!

Great work!
Just a micro remark: Wouldn't it be better to remove the arrow in the Customer-Supplier picture or turn it around?!
I mean the "Customer gets" something which the "Supplier provides". Or did I miss something?
Best greetings
Stefan

Strategic Design: how big is a domain and a bounded-context?

How big is a domain? How big is a bounded-context?

Does a bounded-context belong to a (only one) team (squad in Spotify Model)? Can a domain small-sized to belong to a team? Or does it always represent a bigger thing (like an entire company and its business units* - or each business unit is a domain...)?

I am deep-diving in the DDD's world and I would like to hear some opinions about hierarchies (agg root, bounded context, domain, [after domain?]) and the right size (if that is possible).

*business unit in this context is a line of bussines attended by the company. Example: a bank (company) can offer stock services, core banking services or loans - each as a independent line of business.

Thanks

Miro Board backup file wont upload in Miro

I believe something might be wrong with the "Remote Context Mapping Starter Kit" file. I've tried uploading it to Miro a few times but each time I try I get an error message:

"Sorry, something went wrong"

Team relationships vs patterns.

Could someone please explain better why the "Partnership" and "Customer-Supplier" are patterns and not team relationships? It seems like a mistake of categorization.
Even the explanation of these "patterns" begin with teams relationships.
If the aim of the repo is to simplify the understanding, I think it would be greate to either fix the categorization issue or explain why it was made this way.
I think Evanse's book is not a Bible and could tolerate new interpretations, doesn't it?

Typo in Context Maps Example

Hello,

In the second example, the text is "C and D are mutually dependent" while it's C and B.

HTH.

Access to the repo

Hello, can I have access to post a PR, on this repo?

Small typo in the context map example

Loved the repository!

Just a small fix, I think there is a problem with the following example:

From what I understand from the diagram, the first item should say that C and B are mutually dependent instead of C and D are mutually dependent

What about interchange context pattern ?

First thanks for your work.
Do you think the interchange context pattern as described by Eric Evans here could be a candidate ?

Broken link to Miro Board backup

The page:

https://virtualddd.com/learning-ddd/ddd-crew-context-mapping#contributions-and-feedback

has a broken link to:

https://virtualddd.com/learning-ddd/ddd-crew-context-mapping//7a1da02b8994e78f3381e9c3b091ae47/Remote-Context-Mapping-Starter-Kit.rtb

That should probably be:

https://github.com/ddd-crew/context-mapping/blob/master/resources/Remote-Context-Mapping-Starter-Kit.rtb

2 levels Context Maps

Hello @mploed

I was wondering if you had already seen or done such a thing: having a 2 levels context maps where 1st level would focus only on team relationships and 2nd level, only on context map patterns.

Here's an example:
(and yes, obviously the Cus-->Sup relationship should be the other way round ;) )

Team relationships

Context map patterns

Both

What do you think? Does it make sense or useful to separate both perspective?

Thanks!

Maxime