Too strict dependency pinning

[kmuehlbauer]

Too strict dependency pinning

[amotl]

Indeed, numpy = "^1.22" it is what's in our package metadata here. We need to bump it.

-- https://github.com/earthobservations/wetterdienst/blob/v0.60.0/pyproject.toml#L118

[amotl]

versioning-strategy: lockfile-only . That must have been accidental, but was probably instrumental for a few dependency woes we had been going on.

wetterdienst/.github/dependabot.yml

Lines 8 to 12 in 8b3b522

	- package-ecosystem: "pip" # See documentation for possible values
	directory: "/" # Location of package manifests
	schedule:
	interval: "monthly"
	versioning-strategy: lockfile-only

[amotl]

GH-1016 will resolve that problem, but we will need to do some manual version bumping work beforehand. Currently upgrading Poetry on my machine, because, well, dependency staleness is everywhere.

==> Upgrading poetry
  1.4.2 -> 1.6.1

I am still on Catalina, that means Homebrew needs to actually compile stuff (needs a fresh python@{3.9,3.10,3.11} whatever). Feels a bit like Gentoo, but at least we don't suffer from spindle disks any longer. ;] I may continue on that later this day.

[amotl]

Thanks Moritz. I noticed that as well. Starting with GH-1017, the project metadata will probably need a few more subsequent patches, where polars will also be bumped.

[amotl]

Those are the two major leftovers after bumping all the other dependencies to their most recent versions. Maybe you can add corresponding adjustments to make them being accepted?

• GH-1026
• GH-1027

[kmuehlbauer]

I can take care of the wradlib changes.

[amotl]

Hi again,

thank you so much for your support here, @kmuehlbauer, @gutzbenj, and @xylar.

After refreshing the dependencies on the feedstock package, and updating the corresponding release patch accompanying version 0.61.0, we will need to resolve an issue about the eccodes package, where the Anaconda Buildbot complains on behalf of its Azure Pipelines CI run.

• conda-forge/wetterdienst-feedstock#103
• conda-forge/wetterdienst-feedstock#102

With kind regards,
Andreas.

[amotl]

Hi again,

if Kai is satisfied with the outcome now, I think it is safe to close the issue.

Cheers,
Andreas.

[amotl]

Dear Kai,

thanks for reporting. Wetterdienst should be a good citizen of the packaging ecosystem, so we should look into relaxing that constraint.

I am a bit hesitant on pinning on the lower bound in general, because, well, that does not protect against breaking changes, specifically with dependencies in their 0.x cycles, because we can't look into the future.

In fact, I am asking myself why Dependabot did not submit a corresponding suggestion to upgrade the Pint package here. Maybe the dependencies of the feedstock package (meta.yaml) went out of sync, and need another round of (separate) maintenance?

With kind regards,
Andreas.

P.S.: I didn't look into the details yet, so I was just writing down what came to my mind about this.

[amotl]

1. Dependency definition is Pint = "^0.17" at https://github.com/earthobservations/wetterdienst/blob/v0.60.0/pyproject.toml#L120.
2. Pint 0.22 is available at https://pypi.org/project/Pint/.
3. Dependabot did not send a suggestion to upgrade?
4. Why?

[kmuehlbauer]

Thanks Andreas, much appreciated. It's not only Pint, but also numpy which is stuck at 1.22 and maybe others. Maybe some misconfiguration of dependabot?

[amotl]

All right, I also wanted to ask if you have more candidates to care about. Thanks! About NumPy, there is GH-1009. Not sure why the feedstock says it is different. @xylar did a great amount of work there, supporting us to get things right (thanks again!), maybe it needs a refresh/review?

[amotl]

Oh my. Looking at those patches recently submitted by Dependabot, it looks like it only bumps versions in poetry.lock. Well, there we have it. How is this supposed to work? ;]

-- https://github.com/earthobservations/wetterdienst/pull/1009/files
-- https://github.com/earthobservations/wetterdienst/pull/1010/files

[dostuffthatmatters]

Hi @amotl,

thank you very much for your work on this library! I really enjoy using it.

All right, I also wanted to ask if you have more candidates to care about.

I noticed that polars is still pinned at ^0.16 whereas its library releases are already at 0.19.

Best,
Moritz

[amotl]

Hi again,

I've just tried to bump polars, but there is a problem with version 0.17 already, see ¹.

pip install "polars<0.18" --upgrade
pytest tests/core/timeseries/test_io.py -k test_export_duckdb

👀

-  datetime.datetime(1939, 7, 26, 0, 0),
?                      ^      ----
+  datetime.datetime(1969, 9, 27, 0, 0),
?                      ^   ++++

Because it doesn't work without further ado, I am adding 04b2d1f, which will effectively not change anything on this matter. We will have to humbly ask @gutzbenj about it, to adjust the code correspondingly, when possible. 🙏

With kind regards,
Andreas.

P.S.: GH-1026 attempts to go straight to polars 0.19. Maybe directly working on supporting this version is applicable, instead of bumping through 0.17 and 0.18 first. I don't think we need to support multiple versions here.

Footnotes

1. https://github.com/earthobservations/wetterdienst/actions/runs/6357013086/job/17267515343?pr=1018#step:8:5078 ↩

[gutzbenj]

Dear all,

can we close this issue given the new set of requirements rules?

[kmuehlbauer]

Great work. Thanks a bunch!