It is good practice to minimize the need to revise released ontologies. Revising once released tends to cause breakage in user applications. In a standard, it also causes downstream models to become out of sync.
Extension of released ontologies is fine. Breakage and sync problems are less likely and more easily managed because of the separation of new and existing content, and the need to explicitly import new release content before changes are seen. This can't completely replace revision -- errors and bugs discovered post-release still need to be fixed by revision -- but it can dramatically reduce the frequency.
Two main items on the path to making released ontologies more stable:
(1) Rigorous testing and evaluation, against well-specified requirements, before release. This must be addressed by the tests, test materials, and evaluation process in development.
(2) Small and stability-optimized ontology modules. The current factoring of the FIBO ontologies is not optimized for stability. In fact, it assumes the acceptability of regular revisions to released products. If such revision is to be minimized, some refactoring will be necessary.