elixir-belgium / rdm-guide Goto Github PK

View Code? Open in Web Editor NEW

2.0 2.0 7.0 11.36 MB

This repository is used to build rdm.elixir-belgium.org.

Home Page: https://rdm.elixir-belgium.org

License: Other

SCSS 95.48% Ruby 4.52%

data-management elixir

rdm-guide's People

Contributors

Stargazers

Watchers

Forkers

floradanna bedroesb frederikcoppens kderuyck martenson rabuono vioannid

rdm-guide's Issues

Credit

Could we use the "Credit" page in the sidebar to mention the authors of the website (Bert, Miguel and I)?
We have references at the end of each page, so I don't think we need a list of references also in the "Credit" page.

Updates

Updates:

New licence for ENA
https://bccm.belspo.be for depositing biological materials

Link to RDMkit in the metadata

RDMkit is already mentioned, but this can be more visual:

Issue on page: Submission of SARS-Cov-2 raw reads to ENA in Galaxy

I would like to report an issue on the Submission of SARS-Cov-2 raw reads to ENA in Galaxy page at /covid-19/sarscov2_submission. Description of the issue:

Link to the example metadata is broken.
The here link in this portion.

New description for landing page

Since only Belgian RDM services and tools will be described in RDM Guide while common guidelines will be available in RDMkit, I propose to edit the description in RDM Guide landing page as below:

" Research Data Management Guide (RDM Guide) is an information resource about research data management for biologists and scientists in Life Sciences, curated by ELIXIR Belgium. RDM Guide describes national data management guidelines, resources, tools and services available for researchers in Belgium, which can be applied from the beginning until the end of a research project.

Complementing RDM Guide, common best practices, tools and resources provided by several scientific communities across Europe and data management experts in ELIXIR, can be found in the RDMkit. "

@roncoronimiguel @frederikcoppens What do you think?
I will make a PR after your approval.

Issue on page: Data volume

I would like to report an issue on the Data volume page at /data_volume. Description of the issue:

Considerations for RNA-Seq read length and coverage does not work

extra info about repositories

The Horizon Europe DMP template requires very specific answers that could depends on the kind of services provided by data repositories. We could try to find out the answers to the following questions, for each data repository:

[HorizonEurope] Per repository, specify if it will resolve the dataset identifier.
[HorizonEurope] Will metadata be made openly available and licenced under a public licence?
[HorizonEurope] Per dataset, specify for how long the data will remain available and findable and if metadata will be guaranteed to remain available after data is no longer available.
[HorizonEurope] Will dataset metadata be provided in a machine-readable format to be found by search engines, registries or databases in an automated way (tags, keywords)?
[HorizonEurope] How will you document data provenance? Specify if appropriate standards (such as W3C Prov Model Primer) will be used.
[HorizonEurope] Per dataset, specify if (meta)data will be provided in data interchange formats (such as RDF, JSON-LD, etc).
[HorizonEurope] If your dataset is related to other existing datasets, specify the reference and the type of relation between datasets (qualified reference).

@roncoronimiguel @rabuono @bedroesb @frederikcoppens If you have some of the information, please feel free to add it to this spreadsheet.

better search engine optimization

additional broken links

Fixing additional broken links

Suggestions elixir-be monthly meeting September 2020

To do:

Make a chapter about software
Make a chapter about workflow
General info about storage, until FOSB data architecture is more clear
Add VIB DMP tool
Put recommended repositories as first suggestion in "Data Management in Simple Steps"
Put EGA under Genomics, not transcriptomics