I wanted to let you know that we're publishing a version 2 for the saltpack spec, which includes a new signcryption mode. The specs are up at saltpack.org. The keybase encrypt command has had read support for a couple months now, and we'll switch writing over to the new version shortly.
Hello again.
Why do you use constructions like &byte_array[byte_array(size)] in your code? It can assert or even throw exception depend of STD library realization. Plz fix it. You can use byte_array.end() in most of cases.
Hello. I have a task to decode messages like: BEGIN EDX25519 KEY MESSAGE.
QelLAF802uFpN7H JX4w8wOChAK1yWy U1cwY9jZv1CqHln yNdbI38AZ1wzrvK
vxiZuXPdypPZNu0 zfDU7X747YQHORI mFCqoE19SrG4VEB GlHuYiwLBGcuugm
5xr35QSNC0S3m2a reUgPa1c1ceyRlK 7mNqlZo1Q5Co.
END EDX25519 KEY MESSAGE.
or BEGIN X25519 KEY MESSAGE.
umCRo9iHIudLWoz 4Ugt0hUXQVJ7lhV p7A9mb3kOTg6PeV fhqetAc9ZOUjagi
91gENEkp0xfjF2E Tyakwe90kzo1FNT gRacWRL5B59strN OoZYHQooqvlMKM.
END X25519 KEY MESSAGE.
But now armor functions strongly strict to saltpack specification. Can you think about customizing it?