ghewgill/vim-scmdiff

Vim script to highlight lines changed from a base version in SCM

vim-scmdiff's Issues

would like to compare current file to same file name in another directory

I have two hg repos, one in a test env and another in a live env. Comparing to head is fine, but a lot of times I want to compare my current buffer to the same file in the other account.

I guess I would phrase it as:

When editing "/ud/TEST/foo.txt" and hit binding, diff to "/ud/LIVE/foo.txt" and vice versa. When in LIVE, compare to TEST. I would not want to replace the ability to compare to repo, just in addition to.

Move scmdiff.vim to plugin/scmdiff.vim in the repo

I started recently to use pathogen (https://github.com/tpope/vim-pathogen) with my .vim/ files, inside I also use git submodules to track some vim plugins from other people. So I pull from your scmdiff github repo directly.

It would be nice for people using pathogen to have your repo with the .vim file inside its final directory, like this:

NEWS
README
TODO
plugin/scmdiff.vim <-------

This way, it can be pulled you repo and scmdiff works out of the box inside the .vim/ with pathogen.

I know it is a silly suggestion, I just say it in case it would be interesting to you :-)

Thanks in advance.

Jump to next/prev modified line

Hi,

It would be cool to be able to navigate with scmdiff to the lines that have been modified.

split screen diff feature

It would be nice to be able to do the split screen diff for side-by-side viewing of the versions of the file.

Option to make scm diff work in multi-view mode.

Hello, I understand that this plugin is based on vimdiff which uses split-view to show the differences between two files, but is it possible make it work in multi-window mode ?

I usually have 2+ views in the same vim session ( of different files ) and this plugin fails, when I toggle \d (i think) i tries to vimdiff between the opened files.

No indication of removed lines

If you delete lines, SCMDiff does not show which lines were deleted. It only shows changed and added lines. I'm not sure what the best approach for this would be, however, without actually changing the content of the buffer.