johannesgerer / buchhaltung Goto Github PK
View Code? Open in Web Editor NEWSmart tools for the ledger universe
Home Page: http://johannesgerer.com/buchhaltung
License: MIT License
Smart tools for the ledger universe
Home Page: http://johannesgerer.com/buchhaltung
License: MIT License
Using cabal:
Building buchhaltung-0.0.7...
Failed to install buchhaltung-0.0.7
Build log ( /home/richih/.cabal/logs/ghc-8.4.4/buchhaltung-0.0.7-5R7USOtuokwHjZGxbAxU.log ):
cabal: Entering directory '/tmp/cabal-tmp-7060/buchhaltung-0.0.7'
Configuring buchhaltung-0.0.7...
Preprocessing executable 'buchhaltung' for buchhaltung-0.0.7..
Building executable 'buchhaltung' for buchhaltung-0.0.7..
[ 1 of 15] Compiling Buchhaltung.Utils ( src/Buchhaltung/Utils.hs, dist/build/buchhaltung/buchhaltung-tmp/Buchhaltung/Utils.o )
[ 2 of 15] Compiling Buchhaltung.Types ( src/Buchhaltung/Types.hs, dist/build/buchhaltung/buchhaltung-tmp/Buchhaltung/Types.o )
[ 3 of 15] Compiling Buchhaltung.Ask ( src/Buchhaltung/Ask.hs, dist/build/buchhaltung/buchhaltung-tmp/Buchhaltung/Ask.o )
[ 4 of 15] Compiling Buchhaltung.Common ( src/Buchhaltung/Common.hs, dist/build/buchhaltung/buchhaltung-tmp/Buchhaltung/Common.o )
src/Buchhaltung/Common.hs:154:11: error:
• Couldn't match expected type ‘Bool
-> FilePath -> IO (Either [Char] Journal)’
with actual type ‘IO (Either String Journal)’
• The function ‘readJournalFile’ is applied to four arguments,
but its type ‘InputOpts
-> PrefixedFilePath -> IO (Either String Journal)’
has only two
In a stmt of a 'do' block:
ej <- readJournalFile Nothing Nothing False journalPath
In the second argument of ‘($)’, namely
‘do ej <- readJournalFile Nothing Nothing False journalPath
let (j, n) = either error change ej
if n == 0 then
putStrLn "\nNo transactions were changed!\n"
else
do let ...
....
return
$ maybe
j
(\ j
-> let ...
in
if (n == m) then
j2
else
error
$ printf
"Error 123, see source code. Solution: Use a proper database instead of a file. read: %d passed: %d"
n
m)
journal’
|
154 | ej <- readJournalFile Nothing Nothing False -- ignore balance assertions
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^...
src/Buchhaltung/Common.hs:154:27: error:
• Couldn't match expected type ‘InputOpts’
with actual type ‘Maybe a2’
• In the first argument of ‘readJournalFile’, namely ‘Nothing’
In a stmt of a 'do' block:
ej <- readJournalFile Nothing Nothing False journalPath
In the second argument of ‘($)’, namely
‘do ej <- readJournalFile Nothing Nothing False journalPath
let (j, n) = either error change ej
if n == 0 then
putStrLn "\nNo transactions were changed!\n"
else
do let ...
....
return
$ maybe
j
(\ j
-> let ...
in
if (n == m) then
j2
else
error
$ printf
"Error 123, see source code. Solution: Use a proper database instead of a file. read: %d passed: %d"
n
m)
journal’
|
154 | ej <- readJournalFile Nothing Nothing False -- ignore balance assertions
| ^^^^^^^
src/Buchhaltung/Common.hs:154:35: error:
• Couldn't match type ‘Maybe a3’ with ‘[Char]’
Expected type: PrefixedFilePath
Actual type: Maybe a3
• In the second argument of ‘readJournalFile’, namely ‘Nothing’
In a stmt of a 'do' block:
ej <- readJournalFile Nothing Nothing False journalPath
In the second argument of ‘($)’, namely
‘do ej <- readJournalFile Nothing Nothing False journalPath
let (j, n) = either error change ej
if n == 0 then
putStrLn "\nNo transactions were changed!\n"
else
do let ...
....
return
$ maybe
j
(\ j
-> let ...
in
if (n == m) then
j2
else
error
$ printf
"Error 123, see source code. Solution: Use a proper database instead of a file. read: %d passed: %d"
n
m)
journal’
|
154 | ej <- readJournalFile Nothing Nothing False -- ignore balance assertions
| ^^^^^^^
src/Buchhaltung/Common.hs:464:42: error:
• Couldn't match expected type ‘Bool
-> FilePath -> IO (Either String Journal)’
with actual type ‘IO (Either String Journal)’
• The function ‘readJournalFile’ is applied to three arguments,
but its type ‘InputOpts
-> PrefixedFilePath -> IO (Either String Journal)’
has only two
In the first argument of ‘mapM’, namely
‘(readJournalFile Nothing Nothing False)’
In the second argument of ‘(<$>)’, namely
‘mapM (readJournalFile Nothing Nothing False) jfiles’
|
464 | right mconcat' . sequence <$> mapM (readJournalFile Nothing Nothing False) jfiles
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
src/Buchhaltung/Common.hs:464:58: error:
• Couldn't match expected type ‘InputOpts’
with actual type ‘Maybe a0’
• In the first argument of ‘readJournalFile’, namely ‘Nothing’
In the first argument of ‘mapM’, namely
‘(readJournalFile Nothing Nothing False)’
In the second argument of ‘(<$>)’, namely
‘mapM (readJournalFile Nothing Nothing False) jfiles’
|
464 | right mconcat' . sequence <$> mapM (readJournalFile Nothing Nothing False) jfiles
| ^^^^^^^
src/Buchhaltung/Common.hs:464:66: error:
• Couldn't match type ‘Maybe a1’ with ‘[Char]’
Expected type: PrefixedFilePath
Actual type: Maybe a1
• In the second argument of ‘readJournalFile’, namely ‘Nothing’
In the first argument of ‘mapM’, namely
‘(readJournalFile Nothing Nothing False)’
In the second argument of ‘(<$>)’, namely
‘mapM (readJournalFile Nothing Nothing False) jfiles’
|
464 | right mconcat' . sequence <$> mapM (readJournalFile Nothing Nothing False) jfiles
| ^^^^^^^
cabal: Leaving directory '/tmp/cabal-tmp-7060/buchhaltung-0.0.7'
Warning: could not create symlinks in /home/richih/.cabal/bin for hledger,
ppsh because the files exist there already and are not managed by cabal. You
can create symlinks for these executables manually if you wish. The executable
files have been installed at /home/richih/.cabal/bin/hledger,
/home/richih/.cabal/bin/ppsh
cabal: Error: some packages failed to install:
buchhaltung-0.0.7-5R7USOtuokwHjZGxbAxU failed during the building phase. The
exception was:
ExitFailure 1
Despite the Starbucks example in the documentation, issues #13 and #16 indicate some confusion about the intended purposes of match
and add
. Here's what I've teased out:
match
is meant to complement import
and update
. Accounts chosen during match
should be deterministic so that:
import
ledger effectively reproduces the record from the real accounts transactions are being imported from.add
is used to create transactions offsetting those from the import
:
add
.add
is also used to manually enter transactions that will not appear on any bank or credit account statement. Cash transactions are the most notable example. No one is tracking them but oneself, so there's no electronic record to pull them from. But they constitute a nontrivial part of one's finances.Both of these uses of add
are similar in that they won't match a bank statement and they are ad-hoc and per-transaction, but they are nontrivially different as well. The second use is for real transactions, not just for bookkeeping and classification purposes, and should never offset imported transactions.
At the least, the documentation of this process and these distinctions could be improved. But perhaps these two senses of add
should be split into two separate subtly-different commands. The second sense seems to me to reflect the word add
better; the first sense might be called offset
or whatever the accounting term for this process is called. If two separate commands aren't called for, perhaps a flag to add
could distinguish between them.
I'm using hledger and started using buchhaltung - first of all thank you for this project !!!
It would be great if buchhaltung commit
would would with hledger, currently it doesn't:
--- ~/hledger ‹master* AM⁇› » buchhaltung commit -m'First steps with buchhaltung match'
buchhaltung: ledger: readCreateProcess: runInteractiveProcess: exec: does not exist (No such file or directory)
I'm not even sure if this is the correct place to report it, but during buchhaltung match
I repeatedly stumble upon errors when learning from my accounts:
Done: Assets:Receivable:Misc
Failed: Expenses:Personal:Household
with Code ExitSuccess
And error:
dbacl:warning: dirichlet measure did not converge.
Do you have any hints what what could cause this / what I should look for in my imported ledger file?
Please leave suggestions and your votes in this thread.
Although buchhaltung allows specifying a custom location for configuration, I'm tired of having almost 50 env vars at this point to accomodate for apps that don't conform to how application should store data on Linux and related environments. Instead, it would be nice to have sane defaults that follow the spec and falls back to the legacy default locations.
There is a nice haskell library that implements this.
After importing a few years worth of transactions from multiple accounts, the import.hledger
file grows to ~2MB and becomes no longer navigable with proper syntax highlighting / etc.
Is there a way to split the import file into multiple (perhaps year-based) files and have the buchhaltung update
command just file everything into the appropriate smaller files?
Hi, after using buchhaltung for a few weeks now I came across one credit card payment that results in 4 transactions like this:
» hledger reg amt:262.78
2017/06/29 ABC BANK ... USA ... USD 290,00 K.. Aktiva:ABC:Kreditkarte -262,78 EUR -262,78 EUR
TODO:Positive 262,78 EUR 0
2017/07/27 ABC Bank eG Kreditkarte Abrechnung Aktiva:ABC:Giro -262,78 EUR -262,78 EUR
TODO:Positive 262,78 EUR 0
2017/07/28 ABC Bank Abrechnung vom 18/07/17 Kreditkarte Aktiva:ABC:Kreditkarte -262,78 EUR -262,78 EUR
TODO:Positive 262,78 EUR 0
2017/07/28 ABC Bank Abrechnung vom 18/07/17 Kreditkarte Aktiva:ABC:Kreditkarte 262,78 EUR 262,78 EUR
TODO:Negative -262,78 EUR 0
When I remove these transactions from the buchhaltung import file, and run buchhaltung update
again, they appear in exact the same manner.
How could I supply more details in a safe way ? GPG/Mail ?
Hey,
so I've successfully run buchhaltung setup
. The problems lies in buchhaltung update
. I get (data truncated and anonymized):
[...]
3:2018/02/11 20-56-14:aqbanking(26960):banking.c: 672: Bad IBAN (country code not in upper case)
AqHBCI finished.
Executing Jobs: 3 of 3
Postprocessing jobs
Job Get Transactions: error
Job Get Transactions: error
Job Get Transactions: finished
Resetting provider queues
Executing Jobs: Finished.
buchhaltung: lookupErr: AccountId {aBank = "43060967", aAccount = "MY_ACCOUNT_NUMBER"} not found: Account not configured
CallStack (from HasCallStack):
error, called at src/Buchhaltung/Commandline.hs:38:11 in main:Buchhaltung.Commandline
The relevant part of my config.yml:
aqBanking:
configDir: aqbanking
connections:
- user: 'MY_LOGIN_NAME'
blz: '43060967'
url: "https://hbci-pintan.gad.de/cgi-bin/hbciservlet"
name: 'GLS'
hbciv: HBCI300
type: PinTan
I've never used ledger before, so my ledger files are totally empty by now. What do I need to enter into them so that the update works?
I've tried to properly set up the path to my journal files in the relevant config.yml
but found it difficult to do so.
Neither the documentation nor the config example make it obvious whether the mainLedger
and imported
keys expect absolute or relative paths.
I.e. I would like to point them to ~/jottr/.ledger/
, but when using the k/v pair of mainLedger: ~/.ledger/
, buchhaltung setup
creates a subdirectory in ~/.buchhaltung/~/jottr/.ledger
instead.
Is there a means to config buchhaltung
with absolute paths?
Why is the hledger dependency specified as hledger >= 1.1 && < 1.2
and hledger-lib >= 1.1 && < 1.2
?
For me (nixos-unstable), compilation with stack works fine with hledger >= 1.1
and hledger-lib >= 1.1
, which results in using hledger 1.2.
from the README:
cp config-sample ~/.buchhaltung/config
however, the config-sample file is missing, unfortunately.
I'm trying buchhaltung for the first time. Setting it up, I failed after buchhaltung update
because the ledgers.imported
file is not present, and I have no idea how to add it properly:
The hledger journal file "/home/varac/hledger/buchhaltung-import.ledger" was not found.
Please create it first, eg with "hledger add" or a text editor.
Or, specify an existing journal file with -f or LEDGER_FILE.
Is this file mandatory ? When I don't want to import already existing .csv files but start fresh with buchhaltung ?
I still haven't figuered out what the '>' or '<' symbols mean in the match process prompt:
`[<, >, save, RET]:`
Please update the documentation so all options are described.
Futher more, how do I skip one transaction that I don't want to match right now and carry on matching ?
It seems that plaid may be an affordable API for connecting to banks. This is necessary in the USA because we lack HBCI, and what we do have (OFX) is unworkable.
I'd love to try out connecting to plaid via buchhaltung, but I think that means I'd need to integrate plaid with AqBanking. AqBanking is open source, but I'm not proficient enough in C++ to give it a whirl, and it seems undesirable that we should rely on a C++ project for all such functionality.
A similar use case: I track my work time in a Trello board. I've considered connecting to the Trello API and generating transactions from my work log entries, which will tell me how much I can expect to be paid based on an hourly wage.
Does anyone have any ideas what the best way would be to integrate another http client?
I'm referring to the Starbucks example from the documentation. I'm still new to this, but I find it difficult to manually add corresponding and offsetting transactions to the more general categories I choose for the sake of consistency during match
. What if it were possible to add offsetting transactions during the match process itself? Or perhaps a posting or transaction could be marked to be ignored by the classifier.
to find out which version of buchhaltung is installed (or how could I find out otherwise ?).
I find the reverse order of accounts during the matching process confusing and would like to use the original order instead. Please add a command-line/config file parameter to make this optional, thx!
Using debian's haskell-stack 1.1.2-7+b1 I get the following install error:
$ stack install
Downloaded lts-12.11 build plan.
AesonException "Error in $.packages.cassava.constraints.flags: failed to parse field packages: failed to parse field constraints: failed to parse field flags: Invalid flag name: \"bytestring--lt-0_10_4\""
Do I need more up to date dependencies, or is something else wrong?
I created a accountnames.ledger
containing a list of statements like:
account Expenses:Cats
account Expenses:Dogs
account Income:Sausages
and so on. then i include accountnames.ledger
in my main ledger file. The hope was that buchhaltung
would use these to seed TAB-autocompletion in match
or add
. However, it seems it does not.
Then, I tried to workaround this by generating a bogus transaction with each of these accounts involved at 0 EUR
for each account, and put this on top of the import-ledger. Again, buchhaltung
did not pick it up as autocompletion targets ….
I believe it’d be way more convenient for users who prefer a fixed list of pre-defined accounts to seed auto-completion like this. It also makes accidentally entering invalid or typo-ed accounts less likely.
Nevertheless, thanks for your great tool ^_^
I have both my main hledger as well as the imported transactions from buchhaltung in version control.
I noticed that during a buchhaltung match
, transactions in the imported transactions file are changed by removing some whitespaces, even those that I didn't import:
-2017/08/14 Mr. Foo, Barbar ; generated by 'buchhaltung' 2017-08-16 01:19:48.256125 CEST
+2017/08/14 Mr. Foo, Barbar ; generated by 'buchhaltung' 2017-08-16 01:19:48.256125 CEST
I.e. I run buchhaltung match
, import one single transaction, that save and exit, and 5 others have changed in the way described above.
This messes up proper version control so a fix is appreciated.
Hello @johannesgerer!
Are there any plans to advance this project? Or fix some of the more urgent bugs such as #40 (buchhaltung is incompatible with more recent versions of aqbanking but since PSD2 is in effect, old aqbanking releases cannot connect to any bank anymore unless you use one of the latest beta releases)?
This is not meant to blame or anything; I just really loved the simplicity of doing buchhaltung update
—which is not possible anymore for me due to PSD2 and #40.
If you'd like to continue and need help: I'd be willing to! 🙂
I import transactions from both a checking account and a credit card. When I pay the credit card from the checking account, the transaction is imported twice, once for each account:
2017/12/04 ACH WEBSINGLE XXXXX1234 BARCLAYCARD US CREDITCARD
Assets:Checking:PNC -1,234.56 USD
Liabilities:Credit Cards:Barclaycard 1,234.56 USD ;
2017/12/02 Payment Received
Liabilities:Credit Cards:Barclaycard 1,234.56 USD
Assets:Checking:PNC -1,234.56 USD ;
I'm unsure if this is best handled through some accounting practice I'm unaware of, or if we might adjust duplicate detection to catch this case.
I'm not sure if this is an issue with my shell configuration or rather an issue with how buchhaltung
parses Umlauts.
$ buchhaltung import /tmp/paypal.csv paypal jottr
buchhaltung: Headers do not match. Expected by format 'paypal' version '2016':
["Datum"," Zeit"," Zeitzone"," Name"," Typ"," Status"," W\228hrung"," Brutto"," Geb\252hr"," Netto"," Von E-Mail-Adresse"," An E-Mail-Adresse"," Transactionscode"," Status der Gegenpartei","
Adressstatus"," Artikelbezeichnung"," Artikelnummer"," Betrag f\252r Versandkosten"," Versicherungsbetrag"," Umsatzsteuer"," Option 1 - Name"," Option 1 - Wert"," Option 2 - Name"," Option 2 - Wert"," Auktions-Site"," K\228ufer-ID"," Artikel-URL"," Angebotsende"," Vorgangs-Nr."," Rechnungs-Nr."," Txn-Referenzkennung"," Rechnungsnummer"," Individuelle Nummer"," Belegnummer"," Guthaben"," Adresszeile 1"," Zus\228tzliche Angaben"," Ort"," Staat/Provinz/Region/Landkreis/Territorium/Pr\228fektur/Republik"," PLZ"," Land"," Telefonnummer"," "]
Given:
["Datum"," Zeit"," Zeitzone"," Name"," Typ"," Status"," W\195\164hrung"," Brutto"," Geb\195\188hr"," Netto"," Von E-Mail-Adresse"," An E-Mail-Adresse"," Transactionscode"," Zahlungsart","Status der Gegenpartei"," Adressstatus"," Artikelbezeichnung"," Artikelnummer"," Betrag f\195\188r Versandkosten"," Versicherungsbetrag"," Umsatzsteuer"," Option 1 - Name"," Option 1 - Wert"," Option 2 - Name"," Option 2 - Wert"," Auktions-Site"," K\195\164ufer-ID"," Artikel-URL"," Angebotsende"," Txn-Referenzkennung"," Rechnungsnummer"," Individuelle Nummer"," Belegnummer"," Guthaben"," Adresszeile 1"," Zus\195\164tzliche Angaben"," Ort"," Staat/Provinz/Region/Landkreis/Territorium/Pr\195\164fektur/Republik"," PLZ"," Land"," Telefonnummer"," "]
CallStack (from HasCallStack):
error, called at src/Buchhaltung/Commandline.hs:37:11 in main:Buchhaltung.Commandline
Upon first import of my bank statements I get several thousand statements.
I don't have the need to run the matcher on the full transaction history.
Instead it would be sufficient (less cumbersome) to be able to pass the update/match
-commands either a date range, i.e. somedate-today
or a certain number of n transactions which should be run through the matcher.
I've tried setting up buchhaltung with the mainLedger
and imported
keys set to distinctive ledger files.
After reading the documentation and the comments in config.yml
, I still can't quite grasp the relationship between the two files.
I first understood it like so: imported
stores all the transactions recently imported via the update
command.
After they were matched via the match
command, the newly matched transaction are written to the mainLedger
-file.
This seems to not be the case, since only the imported
-ledger is edited in place, i.e. the information is only stored in the imported
ledger, and not transferred into mainLedger
.
I'd like to use the new (yet unreleased) aqbanking v6. Some cli arguments changed, so some buchhaltung cmds don't work anymore, i.e.:
varac@aqbanking_container:~/.aqbanking$ buchhaltung setup
3:2019/04/15 13-04-51:gwen(39):args.c: 124: Unknown short option "C"
ERROR: Could not parse arguments main
buchhaltung: callProcess: aqhbci-tool4 "-C" "/home/varac/.aqbanking/xxx-yyy" "adduser" "-t" "pintan" "--context=1" "-b" "xxx" "-u" "zzz" "-s" "..." "-N" "..." "--hbciversion=300" (exit 1): failed
varac@aqbanking_container:~/.aqbanking$ aqhbci-tool4 --help
This is version 5.99.23
Usage: aqhbci-tool4 [GLOBAL OPTIONS] COMMAND [LOCAL OPTIONS]
Global Options:
[-D PARAM]
[--cfgdir=PARAM]
Specify the configuration folder
[-n]
[--noninteractive]
Select non-interactive mode.
This automatically returns a confirmative answer to any non-critical
message.
[-A]
[--acceptvalidcerts]
Automatically accept all valid TLS certificate
[--charset=PARAM]
Specify the output character set
[-P PARAM]
[--pinfile=PARAM]
Specify the PIN file
[-h]
[--help]
Show this help screen. For help on commands, run aqbanking-cli <COMMAND> --help.
src/Buchhaltung/Add.hs:23:1: error:
Failed to load interface for ‘Hledger.Cli.Options’
Perhaps you meant
Hledger.Cli.CliOptions (from hledger-0.27.1)
Hledger.Cli.Utils (from hledger-0.27.1)
Hledger.Cli.Main (from hledger-0.27.1)
After fixing this (using the suggested Hledger.Cli.CliOptions
):
src/Buchhaltung/Add.hs:190:41: error:
• Couldn't match expected type ‘ClearedStatus’
with actual type ‘Bool’
• In the ‘pstatus’ field of a record
In the expression: x {pstatus = True}
In the first argument of ‘changeNth’, namely
‘(\ x -> x {pstatus = True})’
src/Buchhaltung/Add.hs:210:19: error:
• Couldn't match expected type ‘Bool’
with actual type ‘ClearedStatus’
• In the first argument of ‘not’, namely ‘(pstatus p2)’
In the first argument of ‘(&&)’, namely ‘not (pstatus p2)’
In the second argument of ‘(&&)’, namely
‘not (pstatus p2) && not (or $ ignoredAccounts <*> [paccount p2])’
src/Buchhaltung/Add.hs:235:27: error:
• Couldn't match expected type ‘ClearedStatus’
with actual type ‘Bool’
• In the pattern: False
In the pattern: Posting {pstatus = False}
In an equation for ‘toMyP’:
toMyP t p@(Posting {pstatus = False})
= MyP (tdate t) (paccount p) <$> listToMaybe (amounts $ pamount p)
I've been using gnucash and i recently started trying to use aqbanking. It seems to me that they will both use the same accounts in aqbanking which in turns means whenever I use one it will override the state of the other. So buchhaltung on it's first use will add the transactions since the last gnucash fetch. Maybe I'm wrong and something else happens, but at the very least aqbanking seems to remember when the last transaction was fetched.
Is there any way i can make buchhaltung fetch all transactions?
Thanks for the nice project!! Very appreciated!
I'm just trying to understand the current situation around the ongoing regulatory changes. Will the transaction download via aqbanking continue to work as PSD2 compliance will be implemented out across the German banks? I failed to find a good resource on this.
I have a bank account that is tied to a credit card. When I log into the account (German bank) I can access both the checking account and the credit card.
When running buchhaltung setup, aqBanking correctly finds two accounts (Account 0 and Account 1) with account 0 being the checking and 1 being the credit card. It only creates one folder, for Account 0, but not for the credit card account.
When running buchhaltung update, only the transactions from the checking account at imported, but not the credit card.
In my config.yml, I have both the numbers of the account and the credit card listed under the same bank ID.
What am I doing wrong?
Please add your package to Stackage as described here.
buchhaltung match
seems to only go through the odd numbered transactions in its queue. Here's a snippet:
Current Transaction: 27, Remaining: 57
uncertainty: 4.88 Groceries:Food:Expenses
[<, >, save, RET]:
Learning: Expenses:Food:Groceries
Done: Expenses:Food:Groceries
Field | Value
---------------- | --------------------
Amount | -2.50
Category | DEBIT
Description | PPA ON STREET METERS
Transaction Date | 04/09/2017
formatName | barclaycard
formatVersion | May 2017
Current Transaction: 29, Remaining: 55
uncertainty: 4.96 Parking:Car:Transportation:Expenses
[<, >, save, RET]:
Learning: Expenses:Transportation:Car:Parking
Done: Expenses:Transportation:Car:Parking
Field | Value
------------- | ----------------------------------
Date | 04/11/2017
Description | ACH WEBRECUR XXXXX4679PA AES STDNT
| LOAN
Withdrawals | $123.45
formatName | pncbank
formatVersion | May 2017
Current Transaction: 31, Remaining: 53
Navigation using <
and >
is still possible.
Hi Johannes,
I stumbled over this project when I searched for an importer for banking transactions over HBCI.
I've already setup AqBanking, I even have written a rules file to import the downloaded CSV.
But I wonder what's the best way to import it into the ledger journal without getting duplicates.
My best idea is to let AqBanking download transactions
(My bank does not provide transactionId
s with the transactions.)
Then I would add it to the journal and call hledger check-dups
.
But how do you solve this problem?
Hi @johannesgerer ,
I came across your project and like it very much, thank you.
One of my banks however gave me a bit of trouble when setting up buchhaltung and aqbanking: their server seems to prematurely terminate the TLS connection failing all aqbanking requests unless a specific flag (tlsIgnPrematureClose
) is set.
Initially I tried to manually set-up aqbanking but then buchhaltung complained about a missing .context
which seems to be created during buchhaltung setup
.
Currently my solution is to hardcode the setting of the flag for all accounts (and temporarily commenting out the other accounts for the setup):
diff --git a/src/Buchhaltung/AQBanking.hs b/src/Buchhaltung/AQBanking.hs
index 8b0841a..4999954 100644
--- a/src/Buchhaltung/AQBanking.hs
+++ b/src/Buchhaltung/AQBanking.hs
@@ -92,6 +92,7 @@ aqbankingSetup = do
, "-s", aqUrl conn
, "-N", aqName conn
, "--hbciversion=" <> toArg (aqHbciv conn)]
+ callAqhbci [ "adduserflags", "-b", aqBlz conn, "-f", "tlsIgnPrematureClose" ]
callAqhbci [ "getsysid" ]
callAqhbci [ "getaccounts" ]
callAqhbci [ "listaccounts" ]
If I could do more in Haskel then blindly copying lines of code I could image to add a userflags
parameter to the aqBanking/connections
section of the config.yml
Other than that maybe this issue can help others when they face issues with the HBCI setup part of buchhaltung to find a suitable workaround.
Using latest master (291ce75) it looks like the commit
command no longer forwards the command line arguments to git:
$ buchhaltung commitHledger -a -m'checking account ok'
Invalid option `-a'
Usage: buchhaltung [-u|--user USER] [-p|--profile FOLDER] COMMAND
[…]
It'll work if I split the arguments like $ buchhaltung commitHledger -- -a -m'checking account ok'
.
buchhaltung update
found 12 new transactions:
found 12 new of 143 total transactions
First round of buchhaltung match
:
» buchhaltung match
...
Current Transaction: 1, Remaining: 11
..
Current Transaction: 3, Remaining: 9
...
Current Transaction: 5, Remaining: 7
...
Current Transaction: 7, Remaining: 5
...
Current Transaction: 9, Remaining: 3
...
Current Transaction: 11, Remaining: 1
...
Current Transaction: 12, Remaining: 0
...
Current Transaction: 12, Remaining: 0
<< DONE! Use 'save' to exit >>
[<, >, save, RET]: save
3 Transactions were changed
But we need more rounds to match all transactions.
Second round:
» buchhaltung match
...
Current Transaction: 1, Remaining: 4
...
Current Transaction: 3, Remaining: 2
...
Current Transaction: 5, Remaining: 0
...
Current Transaction: 5, Remaining: 0
<< DONE! Use 'save' to exit >>
...
3 Transactions were changed
Third round
...
I find I prefer to book transactions as I match
them, rather than going through an entire match
and then add
ing each one. That seems to require the following workflow:
match
that needs to be bookedsave
and exitadd
, typing in the amount from the transaction and selecting the transaction from the menumatch
againThis workflow is okay, but it would be really nice if it were streamlined, even to the point of booking and matching in the same interactive buchhaltung
process.
Generally, when you have buchhaltung add
ed an offsetting transaction to an imported one, it will no longer be suggested in a subsequent run of buchhaltung add
. However, this seems to break down when you change the title of the offsetting transaction (using the t
command during add
).
How is buchhaltung supposed to match offsetting transactions to the corresponding imported one? Is the title used for this?
From a quick reading of the code, the "status" (cleared/unmarked) of transactions is used when deciding which ones to suggest for add
. Is add
supposed to add a "cleared" flag (*
) to the imported transaction when it creates a corresponding offsetting one? Apparently it doesn't do that at the moment.
Often I'd like to add a comment on a transaction to the purpose
field during the match process.
It would be great if one could edit/add to the purpose on the fly during match (by pressing p
i.e.).
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
A PHP framework for web artisans
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
Data-Driven Documents codes.
China tencent open source team.