lunasare/tutorials2021ms

2021 OpenTree Tutorials manuscript repository

Currently submitting to JSDSE Call for papers

https://magazine.amstat.org/blog/2021/07/01/jsdse-call-for-papers/

tutorials2021ms's Issues

prepare for final submission!

• 1. add real citation for galacticEdTools galacticpolymath/galacticEdTools#4 (comment)
• 2. Important to fix, as this will propagate to publication as an issue: "The abstract (in the metadata associated with the paper) is missing spacing in many places (e.g., "reproducibilityare".)"
• 3. "It might be appropriate to consider citing this in-process work (https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.09504)"
• 4. "page 2, end of third paragraph: would it be useful to cite the NASEM 2018 (Data Science for Undergraduates) report, which includes reproducibility and workflow as important components of "data acumen"? In addition, would citation of the NASEM 2019 Reproducibility report be appropriate?"
• 5. "Note style for journal (Taylor & Francis) is to capitalize article and book titles"
• 6. ae: "mentioning package version - which is your first section in the online resource you discuss, so it will be easy to incorporate."
• 7. ae: "In the Conclusions when you provide examples of some institutions adopting reproducibility as a main teaching principle, you could also mention University of Glasgow School of Psychology and Neuroscience - https://psyteachr.github.io/
• 8. r2: "A significant barrier not discussed here is the deprecation of functions in open software packages like R and Python. It often requires considerable programming savvy to repair code that has fallen victim to deprecation."
• 9. Line 38: considerably
• 10. Line 54: “…as a model…”
• 11. Line 30: Define “live programming”
• 12. Line 37: This is called Carpentries here but Software Carpentries in Figure 3’s caption. Are these the same thing?
• 13. Line 53 and elsewhere: “learner’s” and “user’s”.
• 14. Line 12: Warner et al. 2021 do not make this claim in their paper.