Build fails on Joseph's Mac OS X v. 10.9.1

[macroevolution]

Build fails on Joseph's Mac OS X v. 10.9.1

[redcurry]

Hey Joseph! Is the build still failing on your machine?

[josephwb]

Yerp.

On 14 January 2014 11:31, Carlos Anderson [email protected] wrote:

Hey Joseph! Is the build still failing on your machine?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/44#issuecomment-32280620
.

[redcurry]

Could you send me more information (output, log, etc.) that could help me
identify the problem? Thanks!

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Joseph W. Brown
[email protected]:

Yerp.

On 14 January 2014 11:31, Carlos Anderson [email protected]
wrote:

Hey Joseph! Is the build still failing on your machine?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<
https://github.com/macroevolution/bamm/issues/44#issuecomment-32280620>
.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/44#issuecomment-32280673
.

[josephwb]

Can compile it on a 10.8.5 mac, not 10.9.1. May just be a problem with me.
JWB.

On 14 January 2014 11:31, Joseph Brown [email protected] wrote:

Yerp.

On 14 January 2014 11:31, Carlos Anderson [email protected]:

Hey Joseph! Is the build still failing on your machine?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/44#issuecomment-32280620
.

[josephwb]

Sending log to you directly now.
JWB.

On 14 January 2014 11:41, Joseph Brown [email protected] wrote:

Can compile it on a 10.8.5 mac, not 10.9.1. May just be a problem with me.
JWB.

On 14 January 2014 11:31, Joseph Brown [email protected] wrote:

Yerp.

On 14 January 2014 11:31, Carlos Anderson [email protected]:

Hey Joseph! Is the build still failing on your machine?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/44#issuecomment-32280620
.

[ptitle]

I can compile fine on my machine with 10.9.1.

[redcurry]

I think the error has to do with the fact Joseph is not using clang as the
compiler, which can accept multiple architectures to build a "universal
binary" that works for both 32-bit and 64-bit machines. GCC seems to not
like multiple architectures and so spits out a bunch of weird errors. I'll
work on a fix.

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:43 AM, ptitle [email protected] wrote:

I can compile fine on my machine with 10.9.1.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/44#issuecomment-32281914
.

[redcurry]

To test this idea, Joseph could delete one of the "-arch" flags in the
CMakeLists.txt file, line 11, and make again.

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Carlos Anderson <[email protected]

wrote:

I think the error has to do with the fact Joseph is not using clang as the
compiler, which can accept multiple architectures to build a "universal
binary" that works for both 32-bit and 64-bit machines. GCC seems to not
like multiple architectures and so spits out a bunch of weird errors. I'll
work on a fix.

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:43 AM, ptitle [email protected] wrote:

I can compile fine on my machine with 10.9.1.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/44#issuecomment-32281914
.

[redcurry]

Joseph, I updated the CMakeLists.txt file. Please try again.

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Carlos Anderson <[email protected]

wrote:

To test this idea, Joseph could delete one of the "-arch" flags in the
CMakeLists.txt file, line 11, and make again.

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Carlos Anderson <
[email protected]> wrote:

I think the error has to do with the fact Joseph is not using clang as
the compiler, which can accept multiple architectures to build a "universal
binary" that works for both 32-bit and 64-bit machines. GCC seems to not
like multiple architectures and so spits out a bunch of weird errors. I'll
work on a fix.

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:43 AM, ptitle [email protected]:

I can compile fine on my machine with 10.9.1.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/44#issuecomment-32281914
.

[josephwb]

Works for me now. Thanks Carlos.
JWB.

On 14 January 2014 12:58, Carlos Anderson [email protected] wrote:

Joseph, I updated the CMakeLists.txt file. Please try again.

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Carlos Anderson <
[email protected]

wrote:

To test this idea, Joseph could delete one of the "-arch" flags in the
CMakeLists.txt file, line 11, and make again.

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Carlos Anderson <
[email protected]> wrote:

I think the error has to do with the fact Joseph is not using clang as
the compiler, which can accept multiple architectures to build a
"universal
binary" that works for both 32-bit and 64-bit machines. GCC seems to
not
like multiple architectures and so spits out a bunch of weird errors.
I'll
work on a fix.

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:43 AM, ptitle [email protected]:

I can compile fine on my machine with 10.9.1.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub<
https://github.com/macroevolution/bamm/issues/44#issuecomment-32281914>
.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/44#issuecomment-32289368
.