mapping-commons/phenotype

Mappings between human and other phenotype ontologies in SSSOM format

phenotype's Issues

Making a first pass at good mappings

@MardiNenni
@malcolmfisher103

I made a spreadsheet to curate true positive phenotypes here.

You can use this to:

1. Map the top-level XPO classes to HPO classes
2. Add any reviewed XPO-HPO mappings from the uPheno files you already have.

The general rule of thumb: the more human-reviewed mappings the more value, and the more accurate our automated predictions will become.

Add RDF matcher matches in SSSOM

Add uPheno matches in SSSOM

• Label equivalence (preprocessed)
• Logical equivalence
• EQ-derived phenolog (equivalence assuming taxon equivalence)

Generate mappings between XPO and HPO

I would like label/logic based mappings between XPO and HPO.

We have been working on manual mappings between key high level terms from both HPO to XPO and XPO to HPO, we have also been mapping more granular terms on the basis of specific diseases modelled in Xenopus.

We are interested in seeing what correspondences automated label/logic based mappings and possibly how those are changed or supplemented by the manual mappings we are providing. We are also interested in comparing mappings between terms created using design patterns and terms produced more traditionally.

Our ultimate goal is to use these mappings to aid in visualizing Xenopus phenotype data in the context of human phenotypes and diseases.