Layout

[David204354]

Layout

[David204354]

Like this

[maxcleme]

What's the original picture here? IIUC you're saying that your "object" isn't well detached from the background? If yes, then that's usually a resolution issue, here what I would do if I were you:

• Try increase the number of board (meaning more "pixel", so more details"
• Try with a transparent background instead (leaving only the object detached)
• Outline the object better (thinker line)

[David204354]

Im saying the picture that i replied to mixed up the background and the thing/subject

…

On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 1:00 AM maxcleme ***@***.***> wrote: What's the original picture here? IIUC you're saying that your "object" isn't well detached from the background? If yes, then that's usually a resolution issue, here what I would do if I were you: - Try increase the number of board (meaning more "pixel", so more details" - Try with a transparent background instead (leaving only the object detached) - Outline the object better (thinker line) — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#43 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BIOBX2MR3X44PZIYT25TWIDZCBQJ7AVCNFSM6AAAAABHTBWAUOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCMBWG44TOOBXGQ> . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[maxcleme]

I got it, did you try any of the solution I suggested? 😅

Do you mind sharing the original picture as well? I can't help here without further information.

[David204354]

I Meant this [image: download.jpg] On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 10:17 AM David Eckhardt ***@***.***> wrote:

…

[image: download.jpg]here On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 9:45 AM maxcleme ***@***.***> wrote: > I got it, did you try any of the solution I suggested? 😅 > > Do you mind sharing the original picture as well? I can't help here > without further information. > > — > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <#43 (comment)>, > or unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BIOBX2NF3YO4JDKCZ5EJCQTZCDNYBAVCNFSM6AAAAABHTBWAUOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCMBYGA3DKMBSHE> > . > You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: > ***@***.***> >

[maxcleme]

I can't see anything, do you mind going directly to Github and use the website instead? This is what I got:

I Meant this
[image: download.jpg]

[David204354]

Sorry about that

[maxcleme]

Considering the previous picture you sent, this image is obviously cropped and low-res. With such material I've no idea about what the expected pattern size.

However, from what I can guess, you seem to be trying to make what I assumed to be a plushy into a bead pattern. The issue with the outline is that the white background pixels coalesce with the subject outline pixels.

See the outlined area:

The tool is working on a pixel-basis so there is no way it can differentiate the white background pixel from a white object pixel. In such scenario my usual trick is to replace the white background with transparent, making then the distinction clear between background and object. I did this with your picture and you can see it doesn't even sure a bead for the background (because of transparency), outlining the object much better:

This is what I used instead:

[David204354]

Thanks Maxcleme/Beadcolors for helping out with this.

…

On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 11:37 AM maxcleme ***@***.***> wrote: Considering the previous picture you sent, this image is obviously cropped and low-res. With such material I've no idea about what the expected pattern size. However, from what I can guess, you seem to be trying to make what I assumed to be a plushy into a bead pattern. The issue with the outline is that the white background pixels coalesce with the subject outline pixels. See the outlined area: Screenshot.2024-05-14.at.19.27.10.png (view on web) <https://github.com/maxcleme/beadcolors/assets/7669401/b0720a7e-e7f9-4530-bd72-bb9b0244dde4> The tool is working on a pixel-basis so there is no way it can differentiate the white background pixel from a white object pixel. In such scenario my usual trick is to replace the white background with transparent, making then the distinction clear between background and object. I did this with your picture and you can see it doesn't even sure a bead for the background (because of transparency), outlining the object much better: Screenshot.2024-05-14.at.19.35.12.png (view on web) <https://github.com/maxcleme/beadcolors/assets/7669401/05c1b18a-79ee-46a0-b2f3-3ffbc22561b6> This is what I used instead: 330479374-3c3998e9-1a3d-493c-bf8c-4d5e66cd68ed.png (view on web) <https://github.com/maxcleme/beadcolors/assets/7669401/d5711c24-9f76-4298-8a6e-96441084797e> — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#43 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BIOBX2K6KBV3ISU7UVU4NMLZCJDUVAVCNFSM6AAAAABHTBWAUOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCMJQG43TONBWGY> . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[David204354]

Do you have a suggestion for the backgrounds being transparent? On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 1:07 PM David Eckhardt ***@***.***> wrote:

…

Thanks Maxcleme/Beadcolors for helping out with this. On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 11:37 AM maxcleme ***@***.***> wrote: > Considering the previous picture you sent, this image is obviously > cropped and low-res. With such material I've no idea about what the > expected pattern size. > > However, from what I can guess, you seem to be trying to make what I > assumed to be a plushy into a bead pattern. The issue with the outline is > that the white background pixels coalesce with the subject outline pixels. > > See the outlined area: > Screenshot.2024-05-14.at.19.27.10.png (view on web) > <https://github.com/maxcleme/beadcolors/assets/7669401/b0720a7e-e7f9-4530-bd72-bb9b0244dde4> > > The tool is working on a pixel-basis so there is no way it can > differentiate the white background pixel from a white object pixel. In such > scenario my usual trick is to replace the white background with > transparent, making then the distinction clear between background and > object. I did this with your picture and you can see it doesn't even sure a > bead for the background (because of transparency), outlining the object > much better: > Screenshot.2024-05-14.at.19.35.12.png (view on web) > <https://github.com/maxcleme/beadcolors/assets/7669401/05c1b18a-79ee-46a0-b2f3-3ffbc22561b6> > > This is what I used instead: > 330479374-3c3998e9-1a3d-493c-bf8c-4d5e66cd68ed.png (view on web) > <https://github.com/maxcleme/beadcolors/assets/7669401/d5711c24-9f76-4298-8a6e-96441084797e> > > — > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <#43 (comment)>, > or unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BIOBX2K6KBV3ISU7UVU4NMLZCJDUVAVCNFSM6AAAAABHTBWAUOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCMJQG43TONBWGY> > . > You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: > ***@***.***> >

[maxcleme]

Not really, there is plenty of tools out there 😅