Brochure: Clarification about BIPM request

[manuelfuenmayor]

Brochure: Clarification about BIPM request

[opoudjis]

I think this is poorly worded, and that the change request applies only to the first instance: "1979, Resolution 6" is cited twice ("1979, Resolution 6" and "CGPM Resolution 6 (1979)" ---the first is intended as a discursive explanation of the the reference, the second as the actual citation. I think the intent here is to drop the second.

The hyperlinks should be automated for Metrologia, as we've discussed in chat.

So I interpret this as:

was adopted by the 16th CGPM (<<BIPM CGPM Resolution 1979-06,1979, Resolution 6>> and <<BIPM Metrologia 16 1 55,_Metrologia_, 1980, **16**, 56--57>>)

Note that "News from the BIPM" is pp 55-61, so this is citing an extent within the article: ",%page=56-57". I have no interest in this stage in generating the "Metrologia, 1980, 16, 56--57" citation automatically, so don't put this in, but that can be done much, much later.

[manuelfuenmayor]

Thanks @opoudjis, I'm taking your approach.