mooreniemi/graph-function

:chart_with_upwards_trend: graphing your ruby functions

graph-function's Issues

add time measure to "execution time" for clarity

multitrial

add memory performance comparison

we already have benchmark-memory in the project. just need to add a class / classes to the api:

Benchmark.memory {|r| r.report("collapse") { a.collapse }}.entries.first.measurement.memory.allocated

gnuplot upgrade

ruby lib/tdm.rb
dyld: Library not loaded: /usr/local/opt/readline/lib/libreadline.6.dylib                                    |
  Referenced from: /usr/local/bin/gnuplot
  Reason: image not found
Tdm vs IfElse: |=============================================================================================|
Tdm vs IfElse: |=============================================================================================|
/Users/Alex/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.2.2/gems/gnuplot-2.6.2/lib/gnuplot.rb:104:in `write': Broken pipe (Errno::EPIPE)
	from /Users/Alex/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.2.2/gems/gnuplot-2.6.2/lib/gnuplot.rb:104:in `<<'
	from /Users/Alex/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.2.2/gems/gnuplot-2.6.2/lib/gnuplot.rb:104:in `initialize'
	from /Users/Alex/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.2.2/gems/graph-function-0.1.7/lib/graph/function/comparison.rb:18:in `new'
	from /Users/Alex/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.2.2/gems/graph-function-0.1.7/lib/graph/function/comparison.rb:18:in `block in of'
	from /Users/Alex/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.2.2/gems/gnuplot-2.6.2/lib/gnuplot.rb:76:in `block in open'
	from /Users/Alex/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.2.2/gems/gnuplot-2.6.2/lib/gnuplot.rb:75:in `popen'
	from /Users/Alex/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.2.2/gems/gnuplot-2.6.2/lib/gnuplot.rb:75:in `open'
	from /Users/Alex/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.2.2/gems/graph-function-0.1.7/lib/graph/function/comparison.rb:17:in `of'
	from lib/tdm.rb:67:in `<main>'

provide a small set of rantly generators

which are the most common types tested against? how can i arrange this in the project to be as easily extendable by community as possible?

more / full customization of plot options

which options are highest priority for users?

allow unbounded parameter size

unsure if this is wise, because then we have a permutations problem: would want to increase the size of each param concurrently or sequentially?