Mapping to sealed class

[WoodyMKD]

Mapping to sealed class

[tenhobi]

Hi @WoodyMKD, so I checked this case and it seems it's more less the same like situation mentioned in #29.

Basically, this package states that it works with freezed, meaning that it can be both used together. Mapping have to be however specified on case to case basis, since I am not sure we can easily generate code that would support mapping of essentially disjunctive cases. So don't try to tell mappr "map A or B or C or D or E... into X or Y or Z..." but rather "map A to X, map B to Y, map C to Z, ..." and that will be both more clear to you as it will do exactly what you want anytime and also mappr don't have to do some black magic and guess :D

Similar thing also applies to sealed classes, where you also don't want to use that sealed class as a source or target but map it's specific types. We should probably clarify that more in docs. 🤔

[tenhobi]

Hi! Thanks for using the package and I am glad everything works for you other than this case! 🙌

We are at F3.events right now, so we will take a look at this later this week or next one, sorry for inconvenience.

At the meantime, check that Freeze generates fields correctly. 🤔

I can see that also remoteId is missing and both those fields are nullable, so that might be some edge case.

[tenhobi]

Since it's a week without a response, I am closing the issue now. Feel free to reopen the discussion.