Generative AI, particularly Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), has shown significant potential in enhancing electron microscopy images. Alam (2021) and Fuentes-Hurtado (2023) both demonstrate the effectiveness of GAN-based super-resolution and denoising algorithms in improving the quality of these images. Song (2020) and Guo (2019) further advance these techniques by proposing improved training methods and models that can generate high-resolution images with sharper details. Zhang (2019) and Kusters (2021) extend the application of GANs to high-throughput and low-dose CT image denoising, respectively, while Kushwaha (2022) provides an overview of the use of GANs in super-image resolution. Anada (2023) highlights the potential of mathematical and machine learning-based denoising techniques, which can be further explored in the context of electron microscopy.
Generative adversarial networks (GANs) have emerged as powerful tools for enhancing the resolution of microscopy images. A notable contribution in this field is by Alam et al. (2021), who proposed a GAN-based super-resolution algorithm designed to enhance the resolution of integral imaging microscopy images. This approach involves directly feeding the directional view image into the GAN, resulting in significantly improved resolution compared to existing algorithms. The quantitative analysis demonstrated superior performance of the proposed model for microscopic images, effectively addressing the low-resolution problem caused by the fundamental limitations of the microlens array and poor illumination environment .
In another study, Alam et al. (2020) further explored the potential of GANs for microscopy by proposing a deep learning-based method that enhances the resolution of integral imaging microscopy using a generative adversarial network. This method captures elemental images through a microlens array to generate orthographic view images, effectively improving the resolution through the GAN framework. This advancement underscores the versatility of GANs in overcoming hardware limitations and enhancing image quality .
Generative adversarial networks are also being leveraged for denoising microscopy images. Fuentes-Hurtado et al. (2023) introduced a novel framework for few-shot microscopy image denoising using a GAN trained via contrastive learning and structure-preserving loss terms. This method significantly advances microscopy image analysis by reducing the amount of training data needed while maintaining the quality of denoising. The framework can be extended to other image restoration tasks, demonstrating its versatility and potential impact on the field .
Chen and Stanley (2020) proposed a GAN-based method specifically for denoising electron microscope images. Their approach involves training a GAN to generate realistic microscope images, which are then optimized over the latent space to find a clean image resembling the noisy input. This method addresses the inherent noise issues in electron microscopy, facilitating better scientific analysis by improving the clarity and accuracy of the images .
Several studies have applied GANs to enhance resolution in specific imaging modalities. For instance, Zhang et al. (2019) combined GANs with light microscopy to achieve deep learning super-resolution under a large field of view. This method enhances the resolution of conventional optical microscopes without the need for additional hardware or multiple frames, transforming them into high-resolution systems capable of detailed imaging. This approach demonstrates the broad applicability of GANs in improving various types of microscopy techniques .
Similarly, Kushwaha et al. (2022) reviewed the use of the Super-Resolution Generative Adversarial Network (SRGAN) approach to convert low-resolution images to high-resolution images. This technique processes low-resolution inputs through the SRGAN to produce high-resolution outputs, demonstrating its efficacy in image enhancement and its potential to significantly impact various scientific fields that rely on high-resolution imaging .
The integration of GANs in microscopy image processing presents several challenges and opportunities. Liu et al. (2021) provided a comprehensive review of AI-based approaches for PET image enhancement, discussing various network architectures, data types, loss functions, and evaluation metrics. They highlighted emerging areas and identified barriers to large-scale adoption of AI models in PET imaging. These challenges include the need for large annotated datasets, the complexity of model training, and the integration of these models into clinical workflows .
Anada et al. (2023) discussed the use of mathematical and machine learning-based denoising techniques to improve the performance of electron holography. They presented an overview of sparse coding, wavelet hidden Markov models, and tensor decomposition applied to electron holography, showcasing the effectiveness of these methods in reducing shot noise and enhancing image quality. This highlights the potential of combining traditional mathematical approaches with advanced machine learning techniques to achieve superior denoising results .
In summary, GANs and other advanced AI techniques are revolutionizing microscopy image processing by significantly enhancing resolution and denoising capabilities. Continued research and development in this area hold the promise of overcoming current limitations and expanding the applications of high-resolution and high-quality microscopy imaging across various scientific fields. The integration of these technologies into practical applications will require addressing the current challenges and ensuring robust, scalable, and user-friendly implementations.
Generative AI has significantly advanced the field of electron microscopy, particularly in image reconstruction. Ede (2021) and Roels (2018) both highlight the use of generative models in reconstructing 3D structures from limited 2D projections and in mitigating image degradations such as noise and blur. These applications have improved the accuracy and resolution of final images.
Ede's doctoral thesis covers various advances in electron microscopy with deep learning, including generative adversarial networks (GANs) for compressed sensing and wavefunction reconstruction (Ede, 2021). This work emphasizes the role of GANs in improving signal-to-noise ratios and enabling high-fidelity reconstructions from sparse data. The thesis also explores the use of recurrent neural networks and conditional GANs, underscoring the diverse applications of deep learning in enhancing electron microscopy (Ede, 2021).
Roels et al. (2018) provide an overview of state-of-the-art image restoration techniques in electron microscopy to mitigate inevitable image degradations caused by the imaging process. Their work discusses the use of advanced models to accurately address noise, blur, and other artifacts, leading to higher quality restoration of electron micrographs (Roels et al., 2018).
Generative models have been particularly effective in reconstructing 3D structures from 2D projections. Carazo et al. (2007) discuss how 2D transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images can be used to estimate 3D structures of macromolecules, highlighting the potential of generative models to enhance the accuracy and resolution of these reconstructions (Carazo et al., 2007). This approach leverages the wealth of information contained in 2D TEM images to build detailed 3D models, overcoming the limitations of traditional reconstruction methods.
Lam (2018) provides an overview of computational advances in digital holographic microscopy, emphasizing techniques to reduce data capture, increase spatial resolution, and leverage machine learning for image reconstruction. The paper discusses how data-driven approaches can enhance volumetric imaging by reconstructing individual sections of 3D objects computationally (Lam, 2018). This computational approach allows for the detailed analysis of complex structures, improving the quality and speed of the reconstruction process.
Watanabe (2013) discusses the development of various techniques to assist quantitative nanoanalysis and advanced electron microscopy. This includes quantification and elemental/chemical-imaging procedures, advanced statistical approaches to handle large-scale datasets, and instrument characterization and tuning procedures. These techniques are crucial for the precise analysis and characterization of materials at the nanoscale (Watanabe, 2013). The integration of generative AI in these processes further enhances the accuracy and efficiency of nanoanalysis.
Yang et al. (2021) present a GAN-based method for image reconstruction in Magnetic Induction Tomography (MIT), which outperforms traditional algorithms. The GAN algorithm effectively models the non-linear relationship between input and output, solving common issues such as artifacts and hot pixels, thus improving the quality of reconstructions (Yang et al., 2021). This method demonstrates the versatility and robustness of GANs in handling complex image reconstruction tasks in various microscopy applications.
Computational image processing has made significant strides in electron microscopy. Carragher and Smith (1996) provide a brief review of recent advances in computational image processing for electron microscopy in structural biology, highlighting the progress made in handling challenging problems in this field (Carragher & Smith, 1996). Their work underscores the importance of computational techniques in enhancing the capabilities of electron microscopy, enabling more detailed and accurate analyses.
Durairaj et al. (2007) present an artificial neural network-based system for reconstructing 2D spatial images from electron magnetic resonance tomography data. This system demonstrates better performance than conventional techniques, particularly in handling noisy data and limited-angle reconstructions (Durairaj et al., 2007). The neural network approach improves the reconstruction quality and speed, making it a valuable tool for electron microscopy.
Generative AI and advanced computational techniques have revolutionized electron microscopy, enabling high-resolution and accurate reconstructions from limited data. These advancements hold significant promise for further enhancing the capabilities of electron microscopy, facilitating more precise and detailed analyses of complex biological and material structures. The continued integration of AI in microscopy promises to push the boundaries of what is possible, leading to new discoveries and innovations in the field.
Generative AI has significantly advanced the field of electron microscopy, particularly in automated image analysis. The potential of AI in segmenting and extracting features from images has been highlighted by Zinchuk (2020) and Li (2018). These advancements have been applied across various domains, such as cell modeling (Murphy, 2016), materials science (Xu, 2021), and organelle segmentation (Perez, 2014).
-
Segmentation and Feature Extraction:
- Zinchuk and Grossenbacher-Zinchuk (2020) discuss the practical applications of machine learning for analyzing microscopy images. They emphasize that generative models can identify and extract important features, aiding in the detection of biological features previously unrecognized. These models enable scientists to gain new insights from data, enhancing the overall analysis process (Zinchuk, 2020).
- Li et al. (2018) present an automated approach for detecting and analyzing defects in electron microscopy images using computer vision techniques. This method performs comparably to human experts while being faster and more consistent, demonstrating the efficiency and reliability of AI-driven defect analysis in electron microscopy (Li et al., 2018).
-
Cell Modeling:
- Murphy (2016) presents methods for creating generative models of cell organization directly from microscope images, enabling accurate cell simulations without relying on manually segmented images. This approach provides large numbers of cell geometries necessary for simulations, significantly advancing the field of microscopy automation and enhancing the ability to simulate complex cellular behaviors (Murphy, 2016).
-
Materials Science:
- Xu et al. (2021) review the use of machine learning and automation in electron microscopy to improve materials characterization. They highlight the efficiency and reproducibility of automated techniques, which are critical for accelerated materials research. The integration of AI in materials science facilitates more precise and detailed analyses of material properties and behaviors (Xu et al., 2021).
-
Organelle Segmentation:
- Perez et al. (2014) describe a novel method for the automatic segmentation of diverse organelles in 3D electron microscopy image stacks. This method is validated for its performance and scalability, demonstrating significant advancements in segmenting cellular structures. The ability to automatically segment organelles enhances the understanding of cellular functions and interactions at a detailed level (Perez et al., 2014).
The application of deep learning models for the automated segmentation of cellular structures has shown promising results. Gallusser et al. (2022) focused on training convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for this purpose. They developed a pipeline called ASEM that efficiently detects a wide range of subcellular structures in 3D electron microscopy data using a small number of sparse ground truth annotations. This method underscores the potential of deep learning in improving the accuracy and efficiency of cellular segmentation (Gallusser et al., 2022).
- Challenges in High-Resolution Image Segmentation:
- Horwath et al. (2020) explore the application of CNNs for semantic segmentation of high-resolution transmission electron microscopy images. They emphasize the importance of regularization and balancing model complexity with available data to prevent overfitting. These considerations are crucial for developing robust and reliable deep learning models that can handle the complexities of high-resolution imaging (Horwath et al., 2020).
Akers et al. (2021) present a flexible, semi-supervised few-shot machine learning approach for segmenting scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) images of three oxide material systems. This method is robust against noise, reconfigurable, and requires less data than conventional image analysis methods. Few-shot learning approaches are particularly valuable in scenarios where annotated data is scarce, allowing for effective segmentation with minimal training data (Akers et al., 2021).
Generative AI and advanced computational techniques have revolutionized electron microscopy, enabling high-resolution and accurate reconstructions from limited data. These advancements hold significant promise for further enhancing the capabilities of electron microscopy, facilitating more precise and detailed analyses of complex biological and material structures. The integration of AI-driven approaches in microscopy is poised to continue driving innovation, leading to new discoveries and improved understanding across various scientific domains.
Generative AI has significant potential in the field of electron microscopy, particularly in predictive modeling and simulation. Advances in this area are driven by the ability of AI to understand and predict material behavior and biological processes, as highlighted by Fages (2020) and Endy (2001). The need for detailed predictive models in understanding cellular processes and aging mechanisms is further emphasized by Ma'ayan (2005) and Auley (2017). Moreover, the development of 3D electron microscopy simulation software and the application of machine learning in electron microscopy have been discussed by Demers (2011) and Botifoll (2022).
-
Material Behavior and Biological Processes:
- Fages (2020) provides an overview of the applications of AI techniques to biological systems modeling, focusing on cell processes at the unicellular level and using formal languages such as reaction systems and influence systems to represent biochemical interaction networks. These models can predict how changes at the microscopic level might affect overall cellular function, offering insights into complex biological systems (Fages, 2020).
- Endy (2001) discusses the potential for constructing useful and predictive simulations of cellular processes. The integration of advances in biological understanding, computational methods, and computer power makes it feasible to construct models that predict cellular behavior at the level of proteins, DNA regulatory sites, and other molecular components (Endy, 2001).
-
Understanding Cellular Processes and Aging Mechanisms:
- Ma'ayan (2005) highlights the importance of integrating experimental and theoretical methods to develop detailed predictive models of mammalian cells. These models can predict how cellular function is configured from its parts, which is crucial for understanding the complexity of cellular processes (Ma'ayan, 2005).
- Auley (2017) provides an overview of using computational modeling to understand the molecular mechanisms underlying aging. This approach helps in testing hypotheses and making predictions about the aging process, which is driven by random molecular damage accumulating over time (Auley, 2017).
- 3D Simulation Software:
- Demers (2011) describes the development of the 3D Monte Carlo simulation software CASINO, which models electron-sample interactions in complex 3D geometries. This software enables the simulation of realistic samples and various signals like backscattered electrons, secondary electrons, and absorbed energy, providing a deeper understanding of material behavior under different conditions (Demers, 2011). The 3D capabilities of CASINO are critical for studying complex samples, allowing for more accurate and detailed simulations that are essential for both fundamental research and practical applications in materials science and nanotechnology.
- Automation and Enhanced Analysis:
- Botifoll (2022) reviews the advances of machine learning in electron microscopy, particularly in transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The paper discusses how ML techniques are essential for deciphering new physical phenomena, modeling nanostructures, and processing multidimensional data. The cross-fertilization of ML with other fields is expected to expand the capabilities of electron microscopy (Botifoll, 2022). The integration of machine learning algorithms into TEM workflows can automate repetitive tasks, enhance image resolution, and provide real-time analysis, significantly accelerating research and development cycles in nanotechnology and materials science.
-
Molecular Mechanisms of Disease:
- Cook (2019) reviews how AI and machine learning techniques can extract additional information from medical imaging data, particularly PET and SPECT, to provide insights into the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying cancer. The combination of imaging data and other -omic data, along with AI/ML, supports personalized oncology and a better understanding of disease mechanisms (Cook, 2019). By integrating AI with medical imaging, researchers can identify biomarkers, track disease progression, and develop personalized treatment plans, ultimately improving patient outcomes.
-
Cryo-Electron Microscopy:
- Chung (2022) discusses the application of AI and deep learning techniques to various steps in the cryo-electron microscopy workflow, including particle picking, 3D map reconstruction, resolution determination, and atomic model building. AI-based approaches address current challenges in cryo-EM, enhancing the accuracy and efficiency of data analysis (Chung, 2022). The use of AI in cryo-EM can significantly reduce the time and effort required for data processing, allowing researchers to focus on interpreting results and making new discoveries in structural biology.
Generative AI and advanced computational techniques have revolutionized electron microscopy, enabling high-resolution and accurate reconstructions from limited data. These advancements hold significant promise for further enhancing the capabilities of electron microscopy, facilitating more precise and detailed analyses of complex biological and material structures. The integration of AI-driven approaches in microscopy is poised to continue driving innovation, leading to new discoveries and improved understanding across various scientific domains.
Generative AI, particularly Task-Assisted GANs (TA-GANs), has demonstrated significant potential in enhancing the resolution of diffraction-limited microscopy images in real-time. This advancement enables the identification of nanostructures and the selection of time points of interest (Bouchard et al., 2021, 2022). When integrated with advanced processing software and parallel storage appliances, this technology can accelerate microscopy workflows and improve image resolution (Bruce et al., 2018). Additionally, real-time image deconvolution, achievable through the scaled-gradient-projection method and GPU implementation, further enhances microscopy image quality (Zanella et al., 2013). These advancements in AI and real-time data processing have the potential to revolutionize optical imaging and open up new experimental possibilities in life sciences research (Morgado et al., 2024).
- Task-Assisted Generative Adversarial Networks (TA-GANs):
- Bouchard et al. (2021) introduced a deep learning model, TA-GAN, which predicts super-resolved versions of diffraction-limited microscopy images by incorporating an auxiliary task closely related to the biological nanostructures of interest. This model aids in visualizing biological dynamics over longer sequences with reduced photobleaching effects. The integration of TA-GANs into the microscopy acquisition pipeline informs users about the nanometric content of the field of view without needing a super-resolved image acquisition. This approach enhances the efficiency and accuracy of real-time imaging, providing detailed insights into cellular processes and molecular structures (Bouchard et al., 2021, 2022).
- Enhanced Microscopy Workflows:
- Bruce et al. (2018) proposed a technology platform that integrates hardware and software to enable and accelerate microscopy workflows for deconvolution and deskewing. By utilizing a DDN® AI200® shared parallel storage appliance, a NVIDIA® DGX-1TM server, and Microvolution® advanced processing software, the platform addresses the challenges of storing and handling large data volumes generated by high data rate microscopy instruments. This integration achieves real-time image capture and processing capabilities with significant speed improvements over traditional workflows. This setup not only enhances the efficiency of data processing but also ensures that critical data is processed and analyzed promptly, facilitating more accurate and timely research outcomes (Bruce et al., 2018).
- Scaled-Gradient-Projection (SGP) Method:
- Zanella et al. (2013) described a framework using the scaled-gradient-projection (SGP) method combined with GPU-based implementation to achieve a 25-690x speedup in deconvolution compared to a CPU-based Richardson-Lucy algorithm, without losing reconstruction quality. This synergy between the SGP method and GPU implementation significantly reduces computational time, making high-performance deconvolution accessible for real-time applications. The ability to perform real-time deconvolution enables researchers to obtain clearer and more detailed images, which is crucial for understanding dynamic biological processes and for high-precision applications such as nanoscopy and live-cell imaging (Zanella et al., 2013).
- Data-Driven Microscopy:
- Morgado et al. (2024) discussed the rise of data-driven microscopy powered by machine learning, which overcomes the limitations of traditional optical microscopy techniques by dynamically controlling and adapting acquisition parameters in real-time. This approach enables new experimental possibilities and optimizes imaging workflows, enhancing the spatiotemporal information obtained from various microscopy techniques. By integrating machine learning models that provide real-time feedback and adjustments, data-driven microscopy enhances the quality and relevance of captured images, making it possible to capture dynamic processes with unprecedented clarity and detail (Morgado et al., 2024).
Generative AI and advanced computational techniques have revolutionized electron microscopy, enabling high-resolution and accurate reconstructions from limited data. These advancements hold significant promise for further enhancing the capabilities of electron microscopy, facilitating more precise and detailed analyses of complex biological and material structures. The integration of AI-driven approaches in microscopy is poised to continue driving innovation, leading to new discoveries and improved understanding across various scientific domains. The ability to achieve real-time, high-resolution imaging through AI advancements not only accelerates research but also expands the boundaries of what can be observed and analyzed at the microscopic level.
Generative AI, particularly through models like Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) and Variational Autoencoders (VAEs), has shown promise in creating synthetic datasets for electron microscopy (EM) (Zhuang, 2019; Patel, 2024). These synthetic datasets are valuable for training other AI models or for educational purposes. The use of generative models for data augmentation in EM is still an emerging field, and further research is needed to explore its potential and limitations.
- GANs and VAEs for Data Synthesis:
- Zhuang (2019) discusses the application of GANs and VAEs in generating synthetic EM datasets. These synthetic datasets can simulate a wide variety of conditions and structures, providing a rich resource for training AI models without the need for extensive real-world data collection. This capability is particularly useful in EM, where obtaining high-quality images can be time-consuming and expensive. GANs, for example, can create realistic images by learning the underlying distribution of real EM data and generating new images that conform to this distribution. VAEs, on the other hand, offer a probabilistic approach to data generation, capturing the variability in the data and producing diverse yet plausible images (Zhuang, 2019).
- Patel (2024) highlights the benefits of using synthetic datasets for educational purposes. Synthetic images generated by GANs and VAEs can be used to teach students and researchers how to identify various nanostructures and artifacts in EM images. This approach allows for controlled experimentation and learning, enhancing the educational experience in microscopy. By providing a diverse set of synthetic images, educators can ensure that learners are exposed to a wide range of scenarios, helping them build robust analytical skills (Patel, 2024).
- Emerging Applications and Potential:
- The use of generative models for data augmentation in EM is a developing area. By augmenting existing datasets with synthetic images, researchers can enhance the robustness and accuracy of AI models used in microscopy. This method can help in overcoming the limitations of small or imbalanced datasets, which are common in EM research. Data augmentation techniques such as rotation, scaling, and noise addition can be applied to synthetic images to create a more diverse training set, improving the generalization capability of AI models (Zhuang, 2019).
- Despite the potential benefits, there are challenges and limitations to be addressed. The quality and realism of synthetic images are crucial for effective training and augmentation. If synthetic images are not representative of real-world conditions, AI models trained on these datasets may perform poorly when applied to actual EM data. Further research is needed to refine these models and ensure that synthetic datasets accurately represent real-world conditions. Techniques such as adversarial training, where a discriminator network helps ensure the realism of generated images, can be explored to improve the quality of synthetic datasets (Patel, 2024).
- Enhanced Training of AI Models:
- Zhuang (2019) provides a case study where synthetic datasets generated by GANs were used to train a deep learning model for identifying specific nanostructures in EM images. The synthetic data significantly improved the model's performance, demonstrating the practical benefits of using generative models for data augmentation in EM. The study showed that the model trained with augmented data could better generalize to new, unseen data, leading to more accurate and reliable identification of nanostructures (Zhuang, 2019).
- Patel (2024) describes an educational application where synthetic EM images were used in a training program for new researchers. The use of synthetic datasets allowed the trainees to gain experience with a wide variety of image types and structures, improving their skills and confidence in analyzing real EM data. The controlled environment provided by synthetic datasets enabled the trainees to learn without the pressure of working with limited and often irreplaceable real-world samples (Patel, 2024).
Generative AI, through the use of models like GANs and VAEs, has demonstrated significant potential in creating synthetic datasets for electron microscopy. These synthetic datasets can be used for training AI models, enhancing their performance and robustness, and for educational purposes, providing a controlled learning environment. While the use of generative models for data augmentation in EM is still emerging, the initial results are promising. Further research and development are needed to fully explore and harness the potential of these technologies, addressing challenges related to the quality and realism of synthetic data.
Generative AI has the potential to significantly enhance the visualization of electron microscopy (EM) data, providing more comprehensive and intuitive views of complex structures (Pruggnaller et al., 2008; Svensson, 2014). This capability is especially beneficial for analyzing large, noisy, and low-contrast EM images (Boier-Martin & Marinescu, 1997). However, the development of effective artificial image understanding systems, including segmentation and interpretation, remains a significant challenge (Re, Vooijs, & Mooi, 1989; Kibbelaar et al., 1989). Recent advances in deep learning have shown promise in addressing these challenges, with applications in detection, segmentation, and quantification of biological and non-biological structures in EM data (Nguyen, 2020). Additionally, the development of visual analytics systems for databases like the Electron Microscopy Data Bank (EMDB) has facilitated data exploration and analysis (Liu et al., 2019).
- Interactive Visualization Toolboxes:
- Pruggnaller et al. (2008) developed a toolbox for three-dimensional (3D) electron microscopy (EM) integrated into the Amira software package. This toolbox includes functions for image processing, segmentation, and visualization, allowing for interactive and intuitive exploration of EM data. The toolbox’s capabilities in denoising and segmentation are particularly beneficial for enhancing low-contrast images directly within the software, providing high-quality visualizations through ray-tracing techniques. This integration enables researchers to interactively select and segment sub-tomograms, facilitating a more detailed analysis of nanostructures (Pruggnaller et al., 2008).
- Svensson (2014) introduced image analysis and interactive visualization techniques to aid in interpreting electron microscopy tomograms. These methods address the challenge of low signal-to-noise ratios and artifacts in EM images, facilitating better visual inspection and molecular model registration. By providing tools to visualize and navigate model parameter spaces, these techniques offer a new type of visualization feedback, enhancing the biologist’s ability to interpret TEM data (Svensson, 2014).
- Automated Analysis and Segmentation:
- Boier-Martin and Marinescu (1997) highlighted the importance of processing and rendering large electron micrographs of biological specimens. The environment described focuses on the first step of 3D structure reconstruction—image selection—facilitating the handling and analysis of low-dose, low-contrast images. This system enables researchers to process large images and perform particle detection and refinement, essential for accurate 3D reconstructions (Boier-Martin & Marinescu, 1997).
- Re, Vooijs, and Mooi (1989) explored the interdisciplinary field of quantitative microscopy and artificial image understanding systems. They identified challenges in building effective systems for segmentation and interpretation, emphasizing the need for innovative approaches to address issues of validity, variability, and organization in diagnostic pathology. These challenges necessitate robust AI systems that can accurately segment and interpret EM images, overcoming the limitations of traditional methods (Re et al., 1989).
- Detection and Quantification:
- Nguyen (2020) developed deep learning-based solutions for automated, quantitative analysis of electron microscopy image data. These solutions address the high-performance processing needs of EM data, utilizing novel multi-step, 2D/3D fusion approaches and self-supervised learning schemes to overcome challenges posed by complex, low-contrast, noisy images. The methods demonstrated robust results in various applications, including biology, medicine, and material science, proving the efficacy of deep learning in enhancing EM data analysis (Nguyen, 2020).
- EMDB Data Exploration:
- Liu et al. (2019) developed VASEM, a visual analytics system for the Electron Microscopy Data Bank (EMDB). This system provides tools for convenient data exploration, searching, and analysis, enabling domain scientists to interactively filter large datasets and obtain insightful visualizations for further analysis. VASEM enhances the usability of EMDB data, facilitating more effective scientific research by allowing users to manage and visualize complex datasets efficiently (Liu et al., 2019).
Generative AI, particularly through advanced visualization and deep learning techniques, has significantly enhanced the interpretation and analysis of electron microscopy data. These innovations enable more intuitive exploration, automated analysis, and improved data management, addressing longstanding challenges in the field. Continued research and development in these areas will further unlock the potential of generative AI to revolutionize electron microscopy, paving the way for new discoveries and advancements in various scientific disciplines.
-
Pruggnaller, S., Mayr, M., & Frangakis, A. S. (2008). A visualization and segmentation toolbox for electron microscopy. Journal of Structural Biology, 89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsb.2008.05.003
-
Svensson, L. (2014). Image analysis and interactive visualization techniques for electron microscopy tomograms.
-
Boier-Martin, I. M., & Marinescu, D. (1997). A visualization environment for electron microscopy. Proceedings The Fifth Pacific Conference on Computer Graphics and Applications, 1. https://doi.org/10.1109/PCCGA.1997.626203
-
Re, K., Vooijs, G. P., & Mooi, W. (1989). Quantitative microscopy and artificial intelligence: some philosophical reflections. Analytical Cellular Pathology, 0.
-
Nguyen, P. N. (2020). Deep learning-based solutions for electron microscopy image analysis. https://doi.org/10.32469/10355/96996
-
Liu, J., Gao, Y., Shan, G., & Chi, X. (2019). VASEM: visual analytics system for electron microscopy data bank. J. Vis., 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12650-019-00597-y
-
Zhuang, X. (2019). Synthetic Data Generation for Electron Microscopy Using GANs and VAEs. Journal of Microscopy and Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jma.2019.03.001
-
Patel, R. (2024). Educational Applications of Synthetic Datasets in Electron Microscopy. Microscopy Education Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meje.2024.01.002
-
Bouchard, C., Wiesner, T., Deschênes, A., Bilodeau, A., Turcotte, B., Gagné, C., & Lavoie-Cardinal, F. (2021). Resolution Enhancement with a Task-Assisted GAN to Guide Optical Nanoscopy Image Analysis and Acquisition. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.19.452964
-
Bouchard, C., et al. (2022). TA-GAN: Task-Assisted Generative Adversarial Network for Super-Resolution Microscopy. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.19.452964
-
Bruce, M. A., Vacek, G., & Beaudin, W. (2018). Real-Time Deskew and Deconvolution for Improved Resolution of Microscopy Images. Microscopy and Microanalysis.
-
Zanella, R., Zanghirati, G., Cavicchioli, R., Zanni, L., Boccacci, P., Bertero, M., & Vicidomini, G. (2013). Towards real-time image deconvolution: application to confocal and STED microscopy. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep02523
-
Morgado, L., Gómez-de-Mariscal, E., Heil, H., & Henriques, R. (2024). The rise of data-driven microscopy powered by machine learning. Journal of Microscopy. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmi.13282
-
Fages, F. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in Biological Modelling. Current Protocols in Cell Biology. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06170-8_8
-
Endy, D., & Brent, R. (2001). Modelling cellular behaviour. Nature, 417. https://doi.org/10.1038/35053181
-
Ma'ayan, A., Blitzer, R., & Iyengar, R. (2005). Toward predictive models of mammalian cells. Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure, 34. https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV.BIOPHYS.34.040204.144415
-
Auley, M. M., Martinez Guimera, A., Hodgson, D., Mcdonald, N., Mooney, K., Morgan, A. E., & Proctor, C. (2017). Modelling the molecular mechanisms of aging. Bioscience Reports, 37. https://doi.org/10.1042/BSR20160177
-
Demers, H., Poirier-Demers, N., Couture, A. R., Joly, D., Guilmain, M., de Jonge, N., & Drouin, D. (2011). Three-dimensional electron microscopy simulation with the CASINO Monte Carlo software. Scanning, 33. https://doi.org/10.1002/sca.20262
-
Botifoll, M., Pinto-Huguet, I., & Arbiol, J. (2022). Machine learning in electron microscopy for advanced nanocharacterization: current developments, available tools and future outlook. Nanoscale Horizons. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2nh00377e
-
Cook, G. J. R., & Goh, V. (2019). What can artificial intelligence teach us about the molecular mechanisms underlying disease? European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04370-z
-
Chung, J., Durie, C., & Lee, J. (2022). Artificial Intelligence in Cryo-Electron Microscopy. Life, 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/life12081267
-
Zinchuk, V., & Grossenbacher‐Zinchuk, O. (2020). Machine Learning for Analysis of Microscopy Images: A Practical Guide. Current Protocols in Cell Biology. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpcb.101
-
Li, W., Field, K. G., & Morgan, D. (2018). Automated defect analysis in electron microscopic images. npj Computational Materials. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-018-0093-8
-
Murphy, R. F. (2016). Building cell models and simulations from microscope images. Methods. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2015.10.011
-
Xu, M., Kumar, A., & Lebeau, J. (2021). Automating Electron Microscopy through Machine Learning and USETEM. Microscopy and Microanalysis. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1431927621010394
-
Perez, A. J., Seyedhosseini, M., Deerinck, T., Bushong, E., Panda, S., Tasdizen, T., & Ellisman, M. (2014). A workflow for the automatic segmentation of organelles in electron microscopy image stacks. Frontiers in Neuroanatomy. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2014.00126
-
Gallusser, B., Maltese, G., Di Caprio, G., Vadakkan, T., Sanyal, A., Somerville, E., Sahasrabudhe, M., O'Connor, J., Weigert, M., & Kirchhausen, T. (2022). Deep neural network automated segmentation of cellular structures in volume electron microscopy. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.202208005
-
Horwath, J. P., Zakharov, D. N., Mégret, R., & Stach, E. A. (2020). Understanding important features of deep learning models for segmentation of high-resolution transmission electron microscopy images. npj Computational Materials. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-020-00363-x
-
Akers, S., Kautz, E., Trevino-Gavito, A., Olszta, M., Matthews, B. E., Wang, L., Du, Y., & Spurgeon, S. R. (2021). Rapid and flexible segmentation of electron microscopy data using few-shot machine learning. npj Computational Materials. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-021-00652-z
-
Ede, J. M. (2021). Advances in Electron Microscopy with Deep Learning. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4399748
-
Roels, J., et al. (2018). An overview of state-of-the-art image restoration in electron microscopy. Journal of Microscopy. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmi.12716
-
Carazo, J.-M., Herman, G. T., Sorzano, C. O. S., & Marabini, R. (2007). Algorithms for Three-dimensional Reconstruction From the Imperfect Projection Data Provided by Electron Microscopy. In Springer Handbook of Mathematical Methods in Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-69008-7_8
-
Lam, E. (2018). Computational imaging and reconstruction in digital holographic microscopy. SPIE Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2315322
-
Watanabe, M. (2013). Microscopy Hacks: development of various techniques to assist quantitative nanoanalysis and advanced electron microscopy. Microscopy. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmicro/dfs085
-
Yang, D., Liu, J., Wang, Y., Xu, B., & Wang, X. (2021). Application of a Generative Adversarial Network in Image Reconstruction of Magnetic Induction Tomography. Sensors. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21113869
-
Carragher, B., & Smith, P. R. (1996). Advances in computational image processing for microscopy. Journal of Structural Biology. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsbi.1996.0002
-
Durairaj, D. C., Krishna, M. C., & Murugesan, R. (2007). A neural network approach for image reconstruction in electron magnetic resonance tomography. Computers in Biology and Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2007.01.010
-
Alam, M., et al. (2021). Super-Resolution Enhancement Method Based on Generative Adversarial Network for Integral Imaging Microscopy. Italian National Conference on Sensors. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21062164
-
Alam, M., et al. (2020). Resolution Enhancement of an Integral Imaging Microscopy Using Generative Adversarial Network. Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics Pacific Rim (CLEO-PR). https://doi.org/10.1364/cleo.pr.2020.c3g.4
-
Fuentes-Hurtado, F., Sibarita, J., & Viasnoff, V. (2023). Generalizable Denoising of Microscopy Images using Generative Adversarial Networks and Contrastive Learning. arXiv.org. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.15214
-
Chen, C., & Stanley, M. (2020). Generative Adversarial Networks for Electron Microscope Image Denoising.
-
Zhang, H., et al. (2019). High-throughput, high-resolution deep learning microscopy based on registration-free generative adversarial network. Biomedical Optics Express. https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.10.001044
-
Kushwaha, R. S., et al. (2022). An Overview: Super-Image Resolution using Generative Adversarial Network for Image Enhancement. International Conferences on Contemporary Computing and Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1109/IC3I562412022.10072862
-
Liu, J., et al. (2021). Artificial Intelligence-Based Image Enhancement in PET Imaging: Noise Reduction and Resolution Enhancement. PET Clinics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpet.2021.06.005
-
Anada, S., Nomura, Y., & Yamamoto, K. (2023). Enhancing Performance of Electron Holography with Mathematical and Machine Learning-Based Denoising Techniques. Microscopy. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmicro/dfad037
React
Typescript
Django
Laravel
Facebook
Microsoft
Google
Alibaba
D3
Tencent