The vivo-isf-ontology from openrif

vivo:hasSubjectArea

Why we do have vivo:hasSubjectArea property instead of using the dcterms:subject from DC vocabulary?

Links:

http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/#terms-subject
http://www.essepuntato.it/lode/owlapi/http://vivoweb.org/ontology/core#d4e2763

In Role, Position and Relationship definitions I am missing the owl:hasKey (http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/REC-owl2-syntax-20121211/#Keys). Those statements could help us in merging identical relations. Any idea?

http://www.essepuntato.it/lode/owlapi/http://vivoweb.org/ontology/core#d4e9073

 <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/BFO_0000023">
   <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class"/>
   <rdfs:label>Role</rdfs:label>
   <rdfs:subClassOf rdf:resource="http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/BFO_0000017"/>
   <rdfs:subClassOf rdf:nodeID="A142"/>
   <rdfs:subClassOf rdf:nodeID="A123"/>
   <rdfs:subClassOf rdf:nodeID="A127"/>
   <obo:IAO_0000112 rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">Only use if no specific subclasses of core:Role describe the role.</obo:IAO_0000112>
   <obo:IAO_0000115 rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">A person's, group's or organization's role in an endeavor</obo:IAO_0000115>
   <vitro:descriptionAnnot rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">Only use this broad role class if no subclasses of role describe the item being classified.</vitro:descriptionAnnot>
 </rdf:Description>

http://www.essepuntato.it/lode/owlapi/http://vivoweb.org/ontology/core#d4e15782

vivo:Position
   obo:IAO_0000112 ... ;
   obo:IAO_0000115 ... ;
   a owl:Class ;
   rdfs:label "Position" ;
   rdfs:subClassOf vivo:Relationship, [
       a owl:Restriction ;
       owl:onProperty vivo:relates ;
       owl:someValuesFrom foaf:Person
   ], [
       a owl:Restriction ;
       owl:allValuesFrom vivo:DateTimeInterval ;
       owl:onProperty vivo:dateTimeInterval
   ], [
       a owl:Restriction ;
       owl:allValuesFrom <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#int> ;
       owl:onProperty vivo:rank
   ], [
       a owl:Restriction ;
       owl:onProperty vivo:relates ;
       owl:someValuesFrom foaf:Organization
   ] .

vivo:Relationship
   obo:IAO_0000112 "functions as an n-ary predicate"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string> ;
   obo:IAO_0000115 "a reified relationship"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string> ;
   a owl:Class ;
   rdfs:label "Relationship" ;
   rdfs:subClassOf obo:BFO_0000020 .

Deleted

DC vocabularies?

vivo:hasPublicationVenue vs. dcterms:isPartOf
dcterms:isPartOf versus obo:BFO_0000050

It looks like dc and dcterms were not considered during VIVO modeling. Why?

Deleted

IMPORTANT, unwatch this repository, see comment

If you received an email for this issue, it means you are watching the https://github.com/vivo-isf/vivo-isf-ontology GitHub repository.

I am about to move many issues from a Google Code project at https://code.google.com/p/eagle-i/issues/list to this repository and this will generate many notifications. Please un-watch this repository to avoid the emails until this process is completed.

Please add a comment to this issue to confirm that you unwatched the repository. Also, "subscribe" to this specific issue to receive updates about this process. I will add a comment to this issue when the move is completed (and you will get an email if you "subscribe" to this issue) and you can then watch the whole repository again if desired.

openrif / vivo-isf-ontology Goto Github PK

vivo-isf-ontology's People

Contributors

Stargazers

Watchers

Forkers

vivo-isf-ontology's Issues

Recommend Projects

Recommend Topics

Recommend Org