Expression-level '>' operator?

[philippesigaud]

Expression-level '>' operator?

[PhilippeSigaud]

On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Alex Rønne Petersen <
[email protected]> wrote:

So I just got back to working on an old Pegged grammar and noticed that I
used a > operator at the expression level. I cannot for the life of me
recall what that does and it seems to be undocumented (possibly removed?).

@PhilippeSigaud https://github.com/PhilippeSigaud can you shed some
light on this?

Silly, I know. I probably shouldn't have used something undocumented to
begin with..

That dates from an early version, where all rules where silently consuming
spaces between sequence elements.'>' was used to indicate 'no space between
these two elems'.Now, I got back pretty fast to a standard PEG behavior: no
silent space discarding and '>' was never documented.
The special space-arrow was introduced afterwards.

[alexrp]

Great, thanks!