FDR filtering

[pnnl-comp-mass-spec]

FDR filtering

[WinkelsK]

Hi Dave,
thanks for the insights! Makes totally sense how you describe it :)
I'll test out the QValue and PepQValue as quality control filters and see which one works better!
Thanks again!
Best,
Konrad

[dtabb73]

Hi, Konrad.
Because I routinely run MSPathFinderT with only target sequences, I filter PrSMs to require e-values below 0.01 (a similar rule exists in TopPIC) and Probability scores above 0.5. It sounds as though you are running your searches on both target and decoy sequences, so you are in better shape for hitting a particular TDA-estimated FDR. Yes, you can probably just retain the QValues below some maximum to achieve that FDR. I believe PepQValue will be differentiated from QValue by the fact that some proteoforms match multiple spectra; if you're computing FDR by estimated erroneous proteoforms rather than PrSMs, you could go that route instead.
Good luck!
Dave