rafaelsales/ulid

Universally Unique Lexicographically Sortable Identifier implementation for Ruby

ulid's Issues

sysrandom

This gem depends on sysrandom gem, but it is archived already.

Because Ruby 2.5+ tries to use /dev/urandom before openssl, we can rely on it and remove dependency to sysrandom if we drop support Ruby < 2.5. What do you think?

Decode ULID

@rafaelsales any reason there isn't a built-in method to decode to bytes?

It's not clear how to use ULID in Rails apps

How to replace UUIDs with ULIDs in a Rails app that uses UUIDs as primary keys (in PostgreSQL)?

Sort order does not respect millisecond ordering

As I read the spec in this repo, the lexicographical sort ordering of ULIDs should respect the timestamp ordering to millisecond precision. However, this does not appear to always be the case:

require 'ulid'

times = Array.new(5) { |i| Time.new(2020, 9, 3, 13, 9, Rational(i, 10**3)) }

puts 'Times:'
puts times.map { |t| t.strftime('%F %T.%N') }

ulids = times.map { |t| ULID.generate(t) }
puts 'ULIDs:'
puts ulids

sorted = ulids.sort
puts 'Sorted:'
puts sorted

puts "Sort respects time? #{ulids == sorted}"

gives

Times:
2020-09-03 13:09:00.000000000
2020-09-03 13:09:00.001000000
2020-09-03 13:09:00.002000000
2020-09-03 13:09:00.003000000
2020-09-03 13:09:00.004000000
ULIDs:
01EH9XXEV0KCZV2TBC86EGT900
01EH9XXEV1NNSE20T5E9PDH4Q9
01EH9XXEV1HSVWPK0E776QR1ZX
01EH9XXEV3XYZH7SVCH8684MVV
01EH9XXEV4205AFCAVKAT9YH2V
Sorted:
01EH9XXEV0KCZV2TBC86EGT900
01EH9XXEV1HSVWPK0E776QR1ZX
01EH9XXEV1NNSE20T5E9PDH4Q9
01EH9XXEV3XYZH7SVCH8684MVV
01EH9XXEV4205AFCAVKAT9YH2V
Sort respects time? false

The problem being that (in this example run) that 01EH9XXEV1NNSE20T5E9PDH4Q9 sorts after 01EH9XXEV1HSVWPK0E776QR1ZX, despite the timestamp used to generate the former being 1 millisecond before that of the latter. Looking at the timestamp portion of the two ULIDs, they are the same: 01EH9XXEV1, which means both 2020-09-03 13:09:00.001 and 2020-09-03 13:09:00.002map to the same ULID prefix.

Gems don't need to have Gemfile.lock

rationale from @wycats's blog.

Convert to UUID for PostgreSQL `uuid` data type

How would a ULID be converted to a UUID for storage in PostgreSQL?

I think I broke ULID

It has been brought to my attention that ULID has a (sort of) standard associated with it, originating in this javascript repo: https://github.com/alizain/ulid. I honestly thought you had invented it.... Whoops! So, my changes actually break compatibility with the javascript implementation and use an incorrect binary layout in the binary format.

I'm thinking it makes the most sense to roll back the changes and call it a new release... I don't think gems can be un-released, so that may be the only option.

Lexicographic Sort Order?

Hello. I assumed that this meant that I could sort the ULID's - in other words, newer ID's should fall lexicographically after earlier ones:

In mathematics, the lexicographic or lexicographical order (also known as lexical order, dictionary order, alphabetical order or lexicographic(al) product) is a generalization of the way the alphabetical order of words is based on the alphabetical order of their component letters.

So:

Loading development environment (Rails 5.0.0.rc2)
irb(main):001:0> ULID.generate
=> "7S2SYCSA109VJ4Z2ZVB4PBRCDV"
irb(main):002:0> ULID.generate
=> "6K4SYCSA10EVAK6F5E32R1K50C"
irb(main):003:0> ULID.generate
=> "6J6SYCSA10186DZ41ZBV57PZFV"
irb(main):004:0> ULID.generate
=> "Z98SYCSA1036VDH0ANC31A9YNZ"
irb(main):005:0> ULID.generate
=> "EMASYCSA10NEYETVH1DQPPMKJM"
irb(main):006:0> ULID.generate
=> "8CAVYCSA104HS6BH2VBMBMK4TK"
irb(main):007:0> ULID.generate
=> "EYBVYCSA1078FH66T8TZKYV9EX"
irb(main):008:0> ULID.generate
=> "PWDVYCSA108QKE6F8W36TTDJX8"
irb(main):009:0> ULID.generate
=> "X2FVYCSA1031REQ1M1Y00GH33P"
irb(main):010:0> ULID.generate
=> "XDGVYCSA1088A9DZFK7A042GPX"
irb(main):011:0> ULID.generate
=> "XRHVYCSA10KXJ73TGCBCYPDWR7"
irb(main):012:0> ULID.generate
=> "6VJVYCSA100JB4D804HDBNPMVD"

You can see that those entries are not sortable (6VJVYCSA100JB4D804HDBNPMVD sorts before XRHVYCSA10KXJ73TGCBCYPDWR7, and if I'm wrong on that, then 8CAVYCSA104HS6BH2VBMBMK4TK is out of sequence).

Am I missing something?

renen.