Dictionary order influences parseability

[apexys]

Dictionary order influences parseability

[apexys]

Almost forgot: Both variants compile fine through CPython.

[youknowone]

Thank you for the report!
Somehow, x in "d": lambda x: x +1, doesn't exist in symbol table. How about starting comparing how the symbol put in or not put in by the order?

[apexys]

I think its a different problem. On the current main branch, if I run the working version (dict-comp-last), and log the symbol table stack before the code object gets popped in compile_expression->Expr::Lambda after the emit! of the return value , I get

ST stack [SymbolTable(2 symbols, 1 sub scopes), SymbolTable(1 symbols, 0 sub scopes)]
Sub Table Symbols None
ST stack [SymbolTable(2 symbols, 0 sub scopes), SymbolTable(2 symbols, 0 sub scopes), SymbolTable(1 symbols, 0 sub scopes)]

But if I run the non-working version (dict-comp-first), I get

ST stack [SymbolTable(2 symbols, 1 sub scopes), SymbolTable(2 symbols, 1 sub scopes)]

It almost looks like the entry gets put into the symbol table twice.
But why and where does that happen?