seagl / osem Goto Github PK

View Code? Open in Web Editor NEW

This project forked from opensuse/osem

2.0 2.0 3.0 11.36 MB

Home Page: https://osem.seagl.org

License: MIT License

Ruby 74.35% JavaScript 1.41% CSS 0.13% HTML 0.39% Dockerfile 0.04% SCSS 0.95% Haml 22.72% Procfile 0.01%

osem's People

Contributors

Stargazers

Watchers

Forkers

futureperfect emanuil-tolev hixio-mh

osem's Issues

Add diversity donut widget to dashboard

When you log into OSEM and select a conference, you're greeted by a dashboard of donut graphs.

We'd like to add a diversity donut graph to this dashboard.

This work depends on #7.

Hide submitter/presenters during blind voting

We would like the ability to vote on talk proposals without seeing who proposed them, aka blind reviews.

This should be toggle-able. We want initial reviews to be blind, but then see the proposer during subsequent reviews.

No handle to resize textareas

As soon as you focus a textarea with the markdown editor (e.g. Talk submission > abstract or Profile > biography), the handle to resize it disappears. This is caused by the js adding an inline style, resize=none. As someone who likes to resize the textarea to be much larger than required, I think resize=vertical would be the best option here.

From a quick check of http://demo.osem.io/conferences/osemdemo/program/proposals/new, this seems to be an upstream issue (perhaps even in the markdown editor, if that's a separate library?). I'm happy to submit an issue either to https://github.com/openSUSE/osem or to another place (in which case I'll need pointing in the right direction).

Add diversity checkbox to proposal form

Work started on this in #4

We would like to get a checkbox on the talk proposal form for tracking diversity. The phrasing we chose last year is, "identify as a member of a group that is historically under-represented in technology". That still works well.

The UI should be a simple toggle (checkbox, etc). It should not be required for submitting a proposal.

Missing community benefits by being far behind master branch

Hi all,

Congrats on a successful SeaGL! After you all take a short break, I'd like to work with you on getting your osem instance caught up with the master branch, so we can work together on features & fixes. Osem upstream has made a lot of improvements, and you have some features that would make great additions upstream - but they'll need to be forward ported. Additionally, I'd like to get at least one of you on the maintainers list, so we have some more active admins doing continuous upstream maintenance (maintainers upstream seem to come & go based on when their conference needs improvements).

I have a window to collaborate on this until the end of January, 2019... after that LNFW2019 will be in full swing, and I won't be able to work on this... so let's rock & roll!

osem pulling JavaScript from localhost

It's easy to see with uMatrix as there's a line for localhost.

   <!-- Piwik -->
    <script type="text/javascript">
    var pkBaseURL = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://localhost/" : "http://localhost/");
    document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + pkBaseURL + "piwik.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E"));
    </script><script type="text/javascript">

Add Pacific Northwest checkbox to CfP form

Should be simple enough to follow the same pattern as the other additions... should be.

No notification when a confirmed talk is withdrawn

I had this problem last year as well and just hit it for 2018.

Speakers are withdrawing talks after they've been accepted and understandably expect that I'll know that. Except I don't. There are no notifications to organisers when someone withdraws a talk.

This is proving very inconvenient. I just spent several minutes trying to find a talk to schedule but it no longer existed (from a scheduling POV). Last year some people withdrew talks after they were scheduled but I had no notification so I didn't know until the last minute that there were now holes in the schedule.

Notification is necessary when an accepted talk withdraws.

Remove unused proposal requirements

Every year we field a lot of questions about this stuff:

We don't use most of the things which OSEM sees as "requirements":

Perfect world? Everything on that "Your todo list" is a toggle-able option in CFP setup. But we don't live in a perfect world, so…

Things we absolutely want to remove from the process entirely:

Add a subtitle
Add a commercial
Speakers(s) not registered to the conference (since we don't require registration from anyone)

Anything else we get is just a bonus.

Add time + time zone to CFP opening/closing options

The CFP setup form in OSEM only allows you to set the date:

Elsewhere, (under Basics on the conference admin), you can set the time zone of the conference:

But not only can you not set the time for the opening or closing of the CFP, the time used under the covers isn't even in that time zone you defined for the entire conference. It appears to by GMT or UTC instead, but it doesn't tell you that.

To help solve this confusion, plus add clarity & flexibility to the CFP process, I suggest:

Add time setting to the CFP open & close setup form
Add time zone setting to the CFP open & close setup form, defaulting it to the time zone defined in the overall conference options
Make sure this time/time zone is stored consistently in the DB (probably in UTC) and displayed consistently in the UI (using the defined time zone).
Display the date, time, and time zone for CFP closing in all places where this information appears in the OSEM UI, including osem.seagl.org and osem.seagl.org/conferences/$eventcode/program/proposals.

Add first-timer donut graph to dashboard

When you log into OSEM and select a conference, you're greeted by a dashboard of donut graphs.

We'd like to add a first-timer donut graph to this dashboard.

This work depends on #8.

Add 'first timer' checkbox to proposal form

Work started on this in #4.

We would like to get a checkbox on the talk proposal form for tracking first-time speakers. The phrasing we chose last year is, "This will be my first time speaking at a conference." That still works well.

The UI should be a simple toggle (checkbox, etc). It should not be required for submitting a proposal.

No clear path back to the main SeaGL website

It should be easier to find your way back to the SeaGL website, e.g. by clicking on the logo at the top of the page.

Run trial of upstream OSEM

In SeaGL:trial:

Resolve outstanding upstream issues

Audit upstream migrations

Will the migration correctly handle our existing data?

Review local migrations

Is the migration accounted for and its data represented by an upstream feature?

2016-05-01 Add show by default to splashpage 20160501201606
- Rolled back, feature replaced by openSUSE#1994
2016-05-08 Add banner to splashpage 20160508201501
- Rolled back, feature dropped
2016-05-12 Add banner attribution to splashpage 20160512035046
- Rolled back, feature dropped
2017-06-13 Add diversity to events 20170613224853
- Converted to surveys 20220312000831
2017-06-14 Add first time to events 20170614025428
- Converted to surveys 20220312000831
2018-05-22 Add speaker proposal requirements to programs 20180522011758
- openSUSE#1544
2020-07-10 Add pnw to events 20200710065434
- Converted to surveys 20220312000831

Review local commits

Are the needs that led to the commit met upstream?

Add secret proposal reviews

We would like the ability for reviewers to review proposals without seeing the votes or comments from other reviewers, aka secret reviews.

This should be toggle-able. We want initial reviews to be secret, but then see the comments/votes during subsequent reviews.

No email confirmation for talk submissions

During the 2018 CFP we had several people confused and asking whether we'd actually received their proposals. They didn't receive any email confirmations at all.

It's a reasonable expectation that the system would send the submitter a confirmation.

As far as I can tell, this functionality isn't included in OSEM at all…?

It would be nice to add it before 2019.

The email should at a minimum be:

TO: $account_email
FROM: $admin_email
SUBJECT: $conference has received your proposal: $title
BODY:
Thank you for proposing a talk to $conference.

We've received your proposal, "$title".

To make any changes to your proposal, please click this link:
$link_to_proposal

In a perfect world both the subject and the body would be configurable somehow, maybe in the same interface that allows us to configure the accept/reject emails.

Status 500 when using an emoji in a talk rating comment

I entered a talk rating comment that included this:

Damn, it's hard to do these blind when the bio is right there. 😖

Submitting the rating resulted in a Status 500. I hit 'back', removed the emoji, submitted it again and everything worked fine.

Suspicion: it's not just emoji & the field doesn't use unicode.

Recommend Projects

React

A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
Vue.js

🖖 Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
Typescript

TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
TensorFlow

An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
Django

The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
Laravel

A PHP framework for web artisans
D3

Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. 📊📈🎉

Recommend Topics

javascript

JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
web

Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
server

A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
Machine learning

Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
Visualization

Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
Game

Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

Facebook

We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
Microsoft

Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
Google

Google ❤️ Open Source for everyone.
Alibaba

Alibaba Open Source for everyone
D3

Data-Driven Documents codes.
Tencent

China tencent open source team.