social-protocols/social-protocols.github.io

Project Website

social-protocols.github.io's Issues

Broken links

We have some broken links in our articles, for example: https://social-protocols.org/truthtelling-games/

Maybe there is an automated link-checker we can run in our github action.

Article pictures get cropped

Was this intentional?

Deploy fails

@johnwarden The reference commit in the theme submodule doesn't exist anymore:

https://github.com/social-protocols/social-protocols.github.io/actions/runs/5263123115/jobs/9512968696#step:2:175

But updating locally to ae7a321770ab87cba6593a1639116bb117d9ba4e seems to give me a broken site:

any ideas?

Deliberative Poll Article Feedback

Broken Sentence:

As a result , and important comments sometimes get ignored

social-protocols.github.io/content/post/the-deliberative-poll/index.md

Line 34 in 2786ffd

But online discussions are often less effective than in-person conversations. If we are all in the same room, I can look each person in the eye and see who is listening and engaged, and expect immediate responses to what I say (even if the response is overt silence). But in an online group discussion, I don't even know who is "listening", let alone when or if they will respond. As a result , and **important comments sometimes get ignored**.

The link doesn't exist: https://social-protocols.org/distributed-bayesian-reasoning-introduction

The critical thread seems to be oversimplified. There could be many of those important threads, each discussing a different poll option. I suggest removing the critical-thread part altogether.

Who decides that a comment is worth showing to all participants? In theory this can be automatically detected, by measuring which comment has changed a vote. But which are the candidates in the first place? It sounds like a core group has to participate and read all the comments to decide which ones are shown to everybody else. But who is this core group and who is everybody else?