Understanding and creating Solid vocabs

[solid]

Understanding and creating Solid vocabs

[csarven]

Quoting @bblfish 's comment from here b/c I think it describes the original intentions of this repository quite well:

We need to have coherence in the ontologies we use so that our apps can work together . At the minimum we need to list the ontologies which apps are using, with perhaps descriptions of the problems found in those ontologies. This can help us choose interoperable ontologies. We should also document how different apps use them, so that we can start gathering patterns of deployment.

[dmitrizagidulin]

Closing this issue as too general. These questions (one vs many Solid related vocabularies, etc) will evolve during the course of the project.

[csarven]

The goal of this issue was to scope the purpose/intentions of this repo as opposed to addressing all of the details under a single issue.