w3ctag/meetings

Minutes of all TAG Meetings and Calls

meetings's Issues

Explore Possible Web Components "Best Practices" Guide?

As discussed at the April 2015 f2f.

should we rename this repo to "meetings"?

APA Pronunciation TF Review of Implementation Options

こんにちはTAG!

I'm requesting TAG presence at the following virtual meeting during TPAC 2020:

• Group: APA Pronunciation Task Force
• Topic: Discussion of two proposed implementations for Pronunciation FPWD(details in comments below)
• Specification URL: [spec url]
• Explainer (containing user needs and example code)¹: https://w3c.github.io/pronunciation/explainer
• GitHub issues (if you prefer feedback filed there): [url]
• Agenda of your meeting: In progress
• Preferred date and timeframe: Friday, October 16 at 3:00–4:00 UTC https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20201016T15&p1=1440

When the meeting agenda and specific room has been finalized, we request the groups to note these details as comments in this issue.

Please note that we will not officially register as observers, as the assignee for presence will not be decided until all the groups have sent in requests.

Make new design review issue state labels

(and define fast fails)

london f2f logistics page

WebAuthn Discussions

こんにちはTAG!

I'm requesting TAG presence at the following meeting during TPAC:

• Group: WebAuthn
• Topic: General Discussion, direction on Level 2
• Specification URL: https://www.w3.org/TR/webauthn/
• Explainer (containing user needs and example code)¹: https://www.w3.org/TR/webauthn/
• GitHub issues (if you prefer feedback filed there): [url]
• Preferred date and timeframe: Friday Afternoon

When the meeting agenda and specific room has been finalized, we request the groups to note these details as comments in this issue.

Please note that we will not officially register as observers, as the assignee for presence will not be decided until all the groups have sent in requests.

Peer-2-Peer Web

Some interesting info on what Mozilla is doing around P2P in FirefoxOS. Worth talking about the general topic of P2P web on a future call?

Schedule supplementary meeting times

For predictable work sessions which do not require a full quorum.

Update explainer explainer

(Leaving this assigned to Alice so she can yell at those who should contribute.)

Accessibility, Declarative Semantics and WebAssembly, WebGPU, WebGL

In terms of support for explicit declarative semantics, what are the relative advantages of WebAssembly (WASM), WebGPU, or WebGL (including glTF) to support accessibility as well as generic applications? Which of these provide the best architecture? This is being asked in the context of current communication by platform and browser accessibility APIs as well as implications for any future incarnations.

For example, in the Accessible Platform Architectures Working Group (APA) we note the current performance improvements in WASM, via the WebIDL Bindings proposal for better memory management and direct WASM => browser calls. This reference binding expressions from linear memory looks more efficient and potentially better/faster for accessibility related API calls, as well as generic API calls where semantics can be consumed by Assistive Technology.

Some semantics can be inferred in 3D environments and games, for example WebGL-glTF has potential due its ability to generate classes via JSON schema. These rendering environments may also support semantic scene graphs, which can describe the relationships between objects for example.

It would be great if the TAG could share their understanding of the three technologies from a semantic layering perspective. We look forward to discussing this and hearing your thoughts. We will also be having a breakout session at TPAC on XR Accessibility and TAG members are very welcome to attend that, as well as our APA meetings.

Thanks

Josh (Emerging Web Tech W3C/WAI)

Create new tool to generate 1:1 Breakout Agendas

APA Personalization TF

こんにちはTAG!

I'm requesting TAG presence at the following virtual meeting during TPAC 2020:

• Group: APA Personalization TF
• Topic: Discussion of how to pursue a reserved attribute prefix to replace data- which we used during development and
  prototype implementation per Sec. 3.2.6.6 of the HTML specification. We believe this is a simple request, but we want to address any concerns up-front.
• Specification URL: https://w3c.github.io/personalization-semantics/content/#values (latest editor's draft)
• Explainer (containing user needs and example code)¹: https://github.com/w3c/personalization-semantics/wiki/Explainer-for-Personalization-Semantics
• GitHub issues (if you prefer feedback filed there): [url]
• Agenda of your meeting: In Progress
• Preferred date and timeframe: Thursday, October 15, 14:00-15:00 UTC (https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20201015T14&p1=1440)
  When the meeting agenda and specific room has been finalized, we request the groups to note these details as comments in this issue.

Please note that we will not officially register as observers, as the assignee for presence will not be decided until all the groups have sent in requests.

update the webex to match the caldav feed for the upcoming meeting schedule

Immersive Web Working Group TPAC Meeting Request

こんにちはTAG!

I'm requesting TAG presence at the following meeting during TPAC:

• Group: Immersive Web Working Group
• Topic: WebXR Device API
• Specification URL: https://immersive-web.github.io/webxr/
• Explainer: https://github.com/immersive-web/webxr/blob/master/explainer.md
• GitHub issues: https://github.com/immersive-web/webxr/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+sort%3Aupdated-desc
• Preferred date and timeframe: Monday Afternoon Please

When the meeting agenda and specific room has been finalized, we request the groups to note these details as comments in this issue.

Please note that we will not officially register as observers, as the assignee for presence will not be decided until all the groups have sent in requests.

Tagging @cwilso the other co-chair of the Working Group

Topics for Discussion at Meet-Up

This is an issue to capture possible topics for discussion at our developer meet-up on the 1st of February, 2018.

New call times not minuted

Looks lone we didn't minute the discussion of the new call times (although this is reflected in the whiteboard images). I will make a note of them in the minutes for 10-1 - this is mostly a to-do for myself.

Discussion of Pronunciation Task Force Work

こんにちはTAG!

I'm requesting TAG presence at the following meeting during TPAC:

• Group: APA's Pronunciation Task Force
• Topic: Various technical approaches to support required features of Spoken Text Pronunciation, Presentation and existing standards
• Specification URL: https://www.w3.org/WAI/APA/task-forces/pronunciation/
• Explainer (containing user needs and example code)¹: https://github.com/w3c/pronunciation
• GitHub issues (if you prefer feedback filed there): [url]
• Preferred date and timeframe: September 20, Friday, 11AM

When the meeting agenda and specific room has been finalized, we request the groups to note these details as comments in this issue.

Please note that we will not officially register as observers, as the assignee for presence will not be decided until all the groups have sent in requests.

Dependency Graph of W3C Specs?

@tantek suggests: should we have a dependency graph of w3c specs' normative references? Would that help to inform the discussion on overall “architecture”? /cc @darobin #moderntooling

Figure out logistics and setup for a developer meetup in Tokyo

As discussed on 03-14 meeting, I'll ping some people regarding this.

Unanswered questions: Venue, then the timeframe. When and where? How big?

DID WG/TAG

こんにちはTAG!

I'm requesting TAG presence at the following virtual meeting during TPAC 2020:

• Group: DID WG
• Topic: TAG Review of DID Spec
• Specification URL: https://www.w3.org/TR/did-core/
• Explainer (containing user needs and example code)¹: https://github.com/w3c/did-wg/blob/master/did-explainer.md
• GitHub issues (if you prefer feedback filed there): https://github.com/w3c/did-core/issues
• Agenda of your meeting: https://tinyurl.com/yydapmu3
• Preferred date and timeframe: November 3, 2020 19:30 UTC
• Meeting Link: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-did-wg/2020Jun/0000.html

When the meeting agenda and specific room has been finalized, we request the groups to note these details as comments in this issue.

Please note that we will not officially register as observers, as the assignee for presence will not be decided until all the groups have sent in requests.

Process: ISSUE_TEMPLATE.md should better handle cases of active disagreement

@dbaron wrote, in a comment on #356:

I think one of the conclusions is that our template for requesting TAG reviews is better suited for specifications that already have consensus within the group working on them, than for areas with active disputes.

This is an issue for tracking the work of improving the issue template to also handle cases of active dispute / where consensus has not been reached.

Web & Networks Interest Group TAG TPAC Meeting Request

こんにちはTAG!

I'm requesting TAG presence at the following meeting during TPAC:

• Group: Web & Networks IG
• Topic: Usage of hints (network or application) to improve Web QoE
• Specification URL: [spec url]
• Explainer (containing user needs and example code)¹: https://www.w3.org/2019/05/web-networks-ig-charter.html
• GitHub issues (if you prefer feedback filed there): https://github.com/w3c/web-networks/issues
• Preferred date and timeframe: Tuesday 17th

When the meeting agenda and specific room has been finalized, we request the groups to note these details as comments in this issue.

Please note that we will not officially register as observers, as the assignee for presence will not be decided until all the groups have sent in requests.

Tagging co-chairs @gsimcard, Dan and Dom @dontcallmedom to

Update design review issue template