Giter Site home page Giter Site logo

local-cluster's People

Stargazers

 avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar

Watchers

 avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar

local-cluster's Issues

Getting 'undefined function' error on simple test

I wrote a simplified version of a test based on the documentation, over here: https://github.com/whitfin/local-cluster#usage

However, when I run the test it fails (message not received), and I see the following error in stdout:

$ mix test
.
10:03:57.708 [error] Process #PID<20934.220.0> on node :"[email protected]" raised an exception
** (UndefinedFunctionError) undefined function
    #Function<0.60679234/0 in ChatTest."test test node things"/1>()

10:03:57.708 [error] Process #PID<0.220.0> on node :"[email protected]" raised an exception
** (UndefinedFunctionError) undefined function
    #Function<0.60679234/0 in ChatTest>()


  1) test test node things (ChatTest)
     test/chat_test.exs:5
     Assertion failed, no matching message after 100ms
     The process mailbox is empty.
     code: assert_receive :a_message_from_the_node
     stacktrace:
       test/chat_test.exs:14: (test)


Finished in 3.1 seconds (0.00s async, 3.1s sync)
1 doctest, 1 test, 1 failure

Randomized with seed 660329

My test looks as follows:

defmodule ChatTest do
  use ExUnit.Case
  doctest Chat

  test "test node things" do
    [n1, _n2, _n3] = LocalCluster.start_nodes("my-cluster", 3)

    caller = self()

    _n1_pid = Node.spawn(n1, fn ->
      send(caller, :a_message_from_the_node)
    end)

    assert_receive :a_message_from_the_node
  end
end

My test_helper.exs:

# start the current node as a manager
:ok = LocalCluster.start()

# start your application tree manually
Application.ensure_all_started(:my_app)

# run all tests!
ExUnit.start()

My mix.exs:

defmodule Chat.MixProject do
  use Mix.Project

  def project do
    [
      app: :chat,
      version: "0.1.0",
      elixir: "~> 1.14",
      start_permanent: Mix.env() == :prod,
      deps: deps(),
      aliases: [
        test: "test --no-start"
      ]
    ]
  end

  def application do
    [
      extra_applications: [:logger],
      mod: {Chat.Application, []}
    ]
  end

  defp deps do
    [
      {:local_cluster, "~> 1.2", only: [:test]}
    ]
  end
end

My elixir version:

$ elixir --version
Erlang/OTP 25 [erts-13.0.4] [source] [64-bit] [smp:10:10] [ds:10:10:10] [async-threads:1] [jit]

Elixir 1.14.0 (compiled with Erlang/OTP 25)

Anything obvious that I'm doing wrong?
I get the same behavior when I use receive do ... instead of assert_receive
When I delete the assert_receive line, I don't get the 'undefined function` error anymore.

Error when running `LocalCluster.start/0`

When running LocalCluster.start/0 I get the following error:

{:error, 
  {{:shutdown, {:failed_to_start_child, :net_kernel, {:EXIT, :nodistribution}}},  
   {:child, :undefined, :net_sup_dynamic,   
    {:erl_distribution, :start_link, [[:"[email protected]"], false]},   
    :permanent, 1000, :supervisor, [:erl_distribution]}}}

I followed the getting started guide, other then that I have a pretty simple phoenix app with some other deps.

This is my Elixir and Erlang/OTP version:

Erlang/OTP 21 [erts-10.3] [source] [64-bit] [smp:8:8] [ds:8:8:10] [async-threads:1] [hipe] [dtrace]
Elixir 1.8.1 (compiled with Erlang/OTP 21)

Any clue?

Crashes with certain cookies

Some systems generate cookies that have special characters in them, this trips the shell when supplying that cookie with the -setcookie option.

For example, I have the cookie 0mwHxf/~5h{?|pm<ST1PCtean_Be~bT9386.5O9!RL2s5=[YkPLCew%^@[A&CO^x, and shell outputs these errors:

sh: ST1PCtean_Be~bT9386.5O9!RL2s5=[YkPLCew%^@[A: No such file or directory
sh: CO^x: command not found

This is easily fixed by wrapping the cookie with quotes.

How to start a supervisor in the slave nodes?

I am working on a Spawnfest idea and I am using LocalCluster to test the distribution. If I start my supervision tree implicitly (with the :mod key), then Application.ensure_started works and LocalCluster's doc document as much (started applications are replicated to slave nodes).

But how does it work if I don't want to start my app up implicitly? Instead of starting it implicitly, I am requiring users to put it in their supervision tree. In my test, I can manually call start_link to start it which is pretty neat, but when LocalCluster is involved, I am not able to get these supervision tree started there.

I tried to do a :rpc.call(node1, MySupervisor, :start_link, []) but that doesn't work either, is it not possible?

Can we start nodes with test env (MIX_ENV=test)?

Is there a way to start the nodes with test env (MIX_ENV=test)?
I'm using Swarm as a dependency, and by default it logs a lot of data when running in dev mode (info and debug).
While using Local Cluster in a test, I can see all the logs Swarm produces from all nodes on the test cluster as they're running with dev environment.

Is there a way to prevent all these logs to appear during tests but keep them for dev?

Update the readme to show ExUnit.start can run before LocalCluster.start ?

I was following the readme to the letter recently by running LocalCluster.start before my ExUnit.start in the test_helper (Phoenix) but ... strangely enough it turns out you can run the LocalCluster.start in a single setup for just 1 test meaning the ExUnit.start can remain in the test_helper as you would see in any default application layout.

Any reason we can't update the readme to reflect this^ world view?

note: working example app w/ my results to prove its fine running after ExUnit.start

toranb/elixir-budget@b657a18

umbrella apps config

I see that application configs are passed to spawned nodes here

rpc.(Application, :put_env, [ app_name, key, val ])

And looks like it works, but sometimes in my umbrella project some applications are terminating because of missing configs. I have 2 suggestions

is it possible?

Feature Request: Simulating slow or unstable connections

I'd like to use this library not inside unit-tests, but inside some integration tests that ensure that the core functionality of our distributed application (https://planga.io) keeps functioning within expected bounds, even if the connection between nodes is slow, or if from time to time requests are being dropped.

What do you think? ๐Ÿ™‚

Can't load libcluster configuration

Hi, I'm using https://github.com/bitwalker/libcluster to setup, well, the cluster ๐Ÿ˜„
But, for some reason, creating nodes from test via LocalCluster.start_nodes("my_cluster", 2) doesn't pick up libcluster configuration.

In config/config.exs I have:

config :my_app, MyAppWeb.Endpoint,
  ...

config :libcluster,
  topologies: [
    local: [
      strategy: Cluster.Strategy.Gossip,
      connect: {:net_kernel, :connect_node, []},
      disconnect: {:erlang, :disconnect_node, []},
      list_nodes: {:erlang, :nodes, [:connected]}
    ]
  ]

And in application.ex I use topologies = Application.fetch_env!(:libcluster, :topologies) to fetch that configuration and supply it to libcluster. However, :libcluster configuration is empty for nodes created via LocalCluster. At the same time, it is properly picked up when project is started in dev/prod mode and manager node started with tests also picks it up correctly.

In test helper I have:

:ok = LocalCluster.start()
Application.ensure_all_started(:my_app)
ExUnit.start()

Note that if I change the configuration to config :my_app instead of config :libcluster, it all works correctly (configuration is picked up). So there is a workaround, but I'd still like to be able to set the config key properly. Funny thing is, e.g. config :logger is correctly picked up.

Starting local cluster with the main node as a hidden node?

The title here is probably more of a potential solution then the underlying problem.

In a lot of my tests I need to ensure that nodes discover and connect to each other. But when local cluster the primary node connects to the other nodes and creates a full mesh between all of the existing nodes. I'm not even sure if what I want to do is possible but I'm wondering if there's a programatic way to start the main node as a hidden node or something similar so that the cluster behaves as though the main node isn't truly a part of the cluster. I know that you can pass an erl flag to set a node as hidden but I'm not sure if you can do that once the node is already booted.

I might be going in a totally wrong direction here (and if so please tell me so) but I wanted to get your thoughts on it.

Some clarifications

Hello!

Tried this library and got permanent :not_alive error on LocalCluster.start_nodes
Also your library test returned this

00:02:37.767 [info]  Protocol 'inet_tcp': register/listen error: econnrefused                                                                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
** (MatchError) no match of right hand side value: {:error, {{:shutdown, {:failed_to_start_child, :net_kernel, {:EXIT, :nodistribution}}}, {:child, :undefined, :net_sup_dynamic, {:erl_distribution, :start_link, [[:"manager@1
27.0.0.1"], false]}, :permanent, 1000, :supervisor, [:erl_distribution]}}}                                                                                                                                                      
    test/test_helper.exs:2: (file)                                                                                                                                                                                              
    (elixir) lib/code.ex:813: Code.require_file/2                                                                                                                                                                               
    (elixir) lib/enum.ex:783: Enum."-each/2-lists^foreach/1-0-"/2    

I am not sure - may be this issue is trivial and self obvious for true erlang developers, but for noobs like me it was kind of pain.

Finally I got the reason - there must be epmd daemon running.

So may be reflect this requirements in documentation? It seems mandatory condition so looks logical for me to write couple of lines about it.

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    ๐Ÿ–– Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. ๐Ÿ“Š๐Ÿ“ˆ๐ŸŽ‰

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google โค๏ธ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.