wyzgliu/vio_evaluation

Compare state-of-the-art VO/VSLAM/VIO packages in EuRoC datasets. Algorithms include VINS, MSCKF, ORB-SLAM, SVO2 etc.

Evaluation of VIO/VSLAM/VO algorithms

Algorithms Support

• VINS-MONO: https://github.com/HKUST-Aerial-Robotics/VINS-Mono
• S-MSCKF: https://github.com/KumarRobotics/msckf_vio
• ORB-SLAM: https://github.com/raulmur/ORB_SLAM2
• SVO2: https://github.com/uzh-rpg/rpg_svo_example
• our MSCKF: Upcoming

Dataset Support

• EuRoC vio dataset: https://projects.asl.ethz.ch/datasets/doku.php?id=kmavvisualinertialdatasets
• TUM vio dataset(Upcoming): https://vision.in.tum.de/data/datasets/visual-inertial-dataset

How to build package and run on dataset?

Follow the directions of build.md inside each fold.

• Build&Run VINS-MONO
• Build&Run S-MSCKF
• Build&Run ORB-SLAM
• Build&Run SVO2

Note: raw versions of VINS-MONO and S-MSCKF are run on ROS, while others run without ROS. So we download two format(.zip, .bag) of EuRoC dataset for convenience.

Strictly speaking, it's unfair for package who run with ROS bag. Since if the processing frequency is less than image publish frequency, it will lose frame data. In zip file, all data will be processed.

How to evaluate?

We calculate ATE (Absolute Trajectory Error) between estimate trajectory to the groundtruth. RPE (Relative Pose Error) soon.

After build and run, running result will be stored in 'results' folder. Use evaluate_euroc.py to evaluated.

python evaluate_euroc.py <vio_result_dir>

How to compare?

You can compare two or more algorithms' results.

# Compare two
python compare_evaluate.py alg1_name,alg2_name alg1_result_dir alg2_result_dir
# Compare three
python compare_evaluate.py alg1_name,alg2_name,alg3_name alg1_result_dir alg2_result_dir alg3_result_dir

Results

Algorithms details

algorithms	sensor	description	modification
vins	Mono+IMU	Optimization-based VIO, sliding window	Unable loop closure
smsckf	Stereo+IMU	Filter-based VIO, Multi-State Constraint Kalman Filter
orbslam	Stereo	Feature-based VSLAM	Unable loop closure
svo	Stereo	Semi-direct VO, depth filter
ours	Stereo+IMU	Filter-based VIO

ATE on EuRoC

dataset	vins	smsckf	orbslam	svo2	ours
sensor	Mono+IMU	Stereo+IMU	Stereo	Stereo	Stereo+IMU
MH_01_easy	0.156025	x	0.037896	0.111732	0.185233
MH_02_easy	0.178418	0.152133	0.044086	x	0.116650
MH_03_medium	0.194874	0.289593	0.040688	0.360784	0.229765
MH_04_difficult	0.346300	0.210353	0.088795	2.891935	0.261902
MH_05_difficult	0.302346	0.293128	0.067401	1.199866	0.281594
V1_01_easy	0.088925	0.070955	0.087481	0.061025	0.060067
V1_02_medium	0.110438	0.126732	0.079843	0.081536	0.071677
V1_03_difficult	0.187195	0.203363	0.284315	0.248401	0.163459
V2_01_easy	0.086263	0.065962	0.077287	0.076514	0.056529
V2_02_medium	0.157444	0.175961	0.117782	0.204471	0.097642
V2_03_difficult	0.277569	x	x	x	x

Average frame cost on EuRoC(ms)

Details:

• vins: cost of processImage() include back-end estimator, exclude front-end, imu pre-integration.
• smsckf: whole back-end estimator cost.
• orbslam: whole image cost include front-end and tracker thread, exclude mapping thread.
• svo2: whole image cost include include tracker thread, exclude mapping thread.
• ours: same as smsckf

dataset	vins	smsckf	orbslam	svo2	ours
MH_01_easy	44.0	2.2	62.4	4.2	11.3
MH_02_easy	43.7	3.4	61.0	9.4	11.8
MH_03_medium	45.3	3.6	59.4	10.6	12.4
MH_04_difficult	40.4	3.6	51.6	10.9	11.1
MH_05_difficult	40.8	3.8	50.1	10.3	11.5
V1_01_easy	48.9	3.4	50.4	10.3	12.0
V1_02_medium	33.8	2.9	50.0	8.5	12.3
V1_03_difficult	24.2	2.5	49.4	10.0	12.3
V2_01_easy	43.7	3.2	50.1	9.2	11.9
V2_02_medium	32.6	2.9	53.8	10.1	13.1
V2_03_difficult	20.8	1.6	51.1	9.2	9.9
Average cost	38.0	3.0	53.6	9.3	11.9
Average FPS	26.3	333.3	18.7	107.5	84.0

Trajectory on EuRoC

dataset	vins	smsckf	orbslam	svo2	ours
MH_01_easy
MH_02_easy
MH_03_medium
MH_04_difficult
MH_05_difficult
V1_01_easy
V1_02_medium
V1_03_difficult
V2_01_easy
V2_02_medium
V2_03_difficult