Giter Site home page Giter Site logo

figaro's People

Contributors

alicimertcan avatar dvruette avatar

Stargazers

 avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar

Watchers

 avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar  avatar

figaro's Issues

about your forked MuseMorphose

I am sorry for the off topic.
I saw your forked MuseMorphose.
I can not use original Pre-Trained Models.
So if you don't mind, could you please provide your Pre-Trained Models?
Thank you.

Using pm.time_to_tick() twice on Tempo

While looking through your input_representation.py, I noticed that you use self.pm.time_to_tick() twice when saving the tempo_items.

I am talking about this part:

    max_tick = self.pm.time_to_tick(self.pm.get_end_time())
    existing_ticks = {item.start: item.pitch for item in self.tempo_items}
    wanted_ticks = np.arange(0, max_tick+1, DEFAULT_RESOLUTION)
    output = []
    for tick in wanted_ticks:
      if tick in existing_ticks:
        output.append(Item(
          name='Tempo',
          start=self.pm.time_to_tick(tick),
          end=None,
          velocity=None,
          pitch=existing_ticks[tick]))
      else:
        output.append(Item(
          name='Tempo',
          start=self.pm.time_to_tick(tick),
          end=None,
          velocity=None,
          pitch=output[-1].pitch))
    self.tempo_items = output

In line 145 you use max_tick = self.pm.time_to_tick(self.pm.get_end_time()) and then use a loop to go through the ticks from 0 to max_tick. When you append items to the output, you use start=self.pm.time_to_tick(tick), but tick is already a tick and not a time. This gives far bigger values for the tempo start compared to the chords and notes.

I don't know if changing this will help when using your pretrained weights, since this bug may have been there since training. I just wanted to note it nonetheless.

TypeError: __init__() got an unexpected keyword argument 'vae_run'

When I try to generate midi from the command:
python src/generate.py --model figaro --checkpoint ./checkpoints/figaro.ckpt --vae_checkpoint ./checkpoints/vq-vae.ckpt
The issue can be repeated.
And I am sure that the version of every packages I downloaded are correct.

Training with extended chord vocabulary

I am trying to train FIGARO with an extended chord vocabulary (using the provided checkpoints).

I edited get_chord_tokens(...) in vocab.py to match the chord qualities in my dataset. However, when loading the checkpoint, I ran into the error of size missmatch for in_layer.weight and out_layer.weight - obviously, as the vocabulary changed.
Do you happen to know which additional steps are needed to continue training from the existing checkpoints, with a dataset that contains more chord qualities than the ones from the paper?

Thank you in advance!

more detailed information about "duration"

Thank you for your work.

Do you mind helping me out with a little bit more information about the "mean_duration" parameter for the expert description?
The only detailed information about duration that I can find in the paper is: "Mean duration is quantized to 32 logarithmically spaced intervals in [0, 128] positions (12 positions per quarter note)."
If I understand this correctly, this would imply that a duration value of 1 is equal to a note being played for 1/12 quarter notes, whereas a duration value of 32 would mean that it is played for 128/12 quarter notes. However, looking at the generated results from the example descriptions, this doesn't seem to be the case.

Kind regards, and thank you in advance!

Recommend Projects

  • React photo React

    A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.

  • Vue.js photo Vue.js

    ๐Ÿ–– Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.

  • Typescript photo Typescript

    TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.

  • TensorFlow photo TensorFlow

    An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone

  • Django photo Django

    The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.

  • D3 photo D3

    Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. ๐Ÿ“Š๐Ÿ“ˆ๐ŸŽ‰

Recommend Topics

  • javascript

    JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.

  • web

    Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.

  • server

    A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.

  • Machine learning

    Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.

  • Game

    Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.

Recommend Org

  • Facebook photo Facebook

    We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.

  • Microsoft photo Microsoft

    Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.

  • Google photo Google

    Google โค๏ธ Open Source for everyone.

  • D3 photo D3

    Data-Driven Documents codes.