Validator suggestions

[peterdesmet]

Validator suggestions

[peterdesmet]

A foaf:homepage for Catalog is actually mentioned in the mapping documentation.

[peterdesmet]

foaf:homepage described in separate issue: #48

[simon-vc]

Catalog

1. I'll just put english
2. This is an error in the validator
3. I changed it to license, this makes more sense

Dataset

1. I'll set the laguage
2. This is fixed

[peterdesmet]

Great! I almost can't find any more questions/bugs/enhancements that I haven't reported already. 😄

[peterdesmet]

Catalog
2. Will you report the error to the DCAT validator team?

Dataset

1. Make sure to take the metadata language (there is also a data language, but that doesn't apply here).

[simon-vc]

Reported and fixed the validator mistake

Do I need to use Eml#Language or Eml#MetaLanguage?

[peterdesmet]

Eml#MetaLanguage

[simon-vc]

All warnings are fixed

[peterdesmet]

Tested in v1.2: all warnings are now gone, except:

• Validator still does not recognize theme (a validator issue)
• Validator now returns an error: The property: contactPoint can't have multiple objects (reported in #54)

This issue can remain closed.

[pietercolpaert]

Did you open issues in the validator repo? If not, would you find the time to do so and reference them here?

[Amenai]

They are aware of it and we test it with the "local validator" and every thing is fine. No more warnings or errors

[pietercolpaert]

@Amenai what's the "local validator"?

[Amenai]

The not online version of the validator with all bug fixed. They will push it online in a second on
EDIT : "dcat.be/validator"