Superfluous and incorrect `NQA102` errors

[plinss]

Superfluous and incorrect `NQA102` errors

[plinss]

Thanks for the info, found the issue and fixed it. A new version will be available shortly.

While I was there I found some other tweaks I never landed, so picked up those too.

[plinss]

Thanks for the report, can you give example code that generates the NQA102 errors that don't have don't have # noqa comments? I don't need the whole file, but a few lines before and after would be helpful as well.

Looking at the bugbear code it appears that it doesn't send violations for line based checks with # noqa comments (but should send them for AST based checks), so it will also suffer from the same issue as #1 for those. I left a comment on an existing issue in bugbear about this.

[MrkGrgsn]

I noticed the same issue today. It looks like a reporting issue rather than an issue with the checks. Here is one example.

membership.py:307:35: NQA102 (flake8-noqa) "# noqa: N805" has no matching violations
membership.py:388:35: NQA102 (flake8-noqa) "# noqa: N805" has no matching violations
project.py:307:35: NQA102 (flake8-noqa) "# noqa: N805" has no matching violations
project.py:388:35: NQA102 (flake8-noqa) "# noqa: N805" has no matching violations
propose.py:307:35: NQA102 (flake8-noqa) "# noqa: N805" has no matching violations
propose.py:388:35: NQA102 (flake8-noqa) "# noqa: N805" has no matching violations

The first two lines are correct but the subsequent lines are incorrect. They appear to be repeated reporting of the first file's errors attributed to the other files - notice that the line numbers are the same across all 3 files?

[plinss]

Interesting, can you give an example file that has the errors? I don't need your entire source files, just enough to reproduce the error.

[MrkGrgsn]

A simple example is a module with just this:

def my_func():
    pass  # noqa: W605

Any file checked after will have the same error reported, even if it's empty.

Edit: add environment info

$ flake8 --version
3.8.3 (flake8-noqa: 1.0.5, mccabe: 0.6.1, pycodestyle: 2.6.0, pyflakes: 2.2.0)
CPython 3.6.12 on Linux

[MrkGrgsn]

Thanks @plinss it is working very nicely now.

[jace]

I'm experiencing the same with flake8-noqa==1.1.0 (from PyPI). Code:

    print(f"Downloading {filename}...")  # NOQA: T001

flake8 (with flake8-print==4.0.0, which causes the T001):

file.py:135:42: NQA102 "# NOQA: T001" has no matching violations

[jace]

Oh I see the flake8-print issue has been reported in #1 already. I'm also experiencing this with codes B902 (flake8-blind-except), A003 (flake8-builtins), S105 and S106 (flake8-bandit).