B902: False positive when using the attrs library

[henzef]

B902: False positive when using the attrs library

[henzef]

Maybe @jakkdl or @Zac-HD have an idea how to fix it? I think attrs is a pretty common library, so it would be great if someone could fix it.

[jakkdl]

Being conservative with the defaults is probably the way to go, feel free to open a PR changing it + the docs. It should be quite painless to implement.

[henzef]

See #405

[jakkdl]

With --classmethod-decorators you can overwrite the default values, so if you use --classmethod-decoraters=classmethod you'll suppress the errors.

The question is mostly what the default should be, but could maybe also update the documentation.

[mcmasn-amzn]

I ran into this as well. I think a sensible default is just classmethod. If the checker can also include the python package of the decorator, then it makes sense to include some additional defaults. For instance, @validator in attrs is not a classmethod, but it is in Pydantic.

[natemcmaster]

#459