ryanb / nested_form Goto Github PK
View Code? Open in Web Editor NEWRails plugin to conveniently handle multiple models in a single form.
License: MIT License
Rails plugin to conveniently handle multiple models in a single form.
License: MIT License
Would it be possible to support some manner of add remove via the same links for a browser with JavaScript disabled (might already be possible and I'm missing something obvious)?
Hi!
Good work Ryan!!! But something goes wrong in my project. I cannot destroy an image (I use carrierwave). If I click on "remove" the _destroy input tag is set to "1" but the image remains on save. Have you an idea? I have added "accepts_nested_attributes_for :assets, :allow_destroy => true" to the asset model and the other code is ok.
I use:
Rails 3.0.3
Ruby 1.9.2
Bye
I tried to migrate my edit page from erb to haml, but it gives me error for this line about wrong ) or }:
My config:
nested_form (0.1.0)
rails (3.0.5)
haml (3.0.25)
compass (0.10.6)
Is there a complete example which uses the nested_form plugin?
So this one is a bit selfish...
I think it'd be nice to have some sample code on how to utilize the jquery events (i.e. nested.fieldAdded) to access the fields that were added. I'm a JS/jquery n00b and I'm slogging my way through it now. If I get it working, I'll add a sample myself. Otherwise, I'll hope someone else beats me to it.
I'm attempting to bind a jqueryui datepicker to any fields that are added that have the class datepicker.
Using JQuery 1.4.2. and Rails 2.3.5
Gist of the form: http://gist.github.com/310606
A simple fix would be to remove "form" from the javascript on line 38, or possibly replace "form" with .fields.
The nested_form_for method does not seem to be able to render the fields from that model.
The output that I get from the form is just raw html, no fields, like so:
Is this plugin supported for rails3 or will it be soon.
In my plain rails app I have tested the gem and with prototype there's perhaps a problem that the submit button is dropped out of the form. I can add and remove nested attrivutes, but saving isn't possible.
here is a gist with my form, the models and the rendered html output.
https://gist.github.com/948159
Each field after the call of nested_form_for ist dropped out of the form behind the template blueprint. This could be a prototype js problem.
my system: rails 3.0.7 , ruby 1.8.7 p249
thanks
The tests need a lot of work. They should be changed to use RSpec request specs with Capybara and a sample Rails app. This way I can mimic the functionality and test JavaScript too.
Hi,
I am using the nested_form_for gem for the first time. I don't know if this is an issue or if I am using it wrong, but I am getting an "undefined method nested_form_for" error.
I have a pretty regular form as you can see:
<%= nested_form_for @zz_user do |f| %>
<%= f.fields_for :zz_godfathers do |godfather_form| %>
<%= godfather_form.label :user_godson_id %> <br/>
<%= godfather_form.text_field :user_godson_id %> <br/>
<%= godfather_form.label :description %> <br/>
<%= godfather_form.text_field :description %> <br/>
<% end %>
<% end %>
<%= f.link_to_remove "Remove this godfather", :zz_godfathers %>
<%= f.link_to_add "Add a godfather", :zz_godfathers %>
By the way, I installed the gem and ran the: rails generate nested_form:install command to generate the nested_form.js file that I included in my layout.
Any idea?
Thanks!
I have run into a problem while trying to use tinymce for one of my nested fields. I am using jQuery and I believe the issue is that
$('form a.add_nested_fields').live('click', function() {
//...
var content = $('#' + assoc + '_fields_blueprint').html(); // Fields template
the html method call to pull in the content is not pulling in tinymce's iframe html. This is to be expected, but I cannot figure out a good way to pull everything from the fields blueprint into the content var. Note: the fields blueprint does appear correctly on the page with the iframe fully populated.
If you add an item, get its inputs into an invalid state (e.g., by leaving a required field blank), and then remove the item, client_side_validations
(and probably other client-side validation solutions) will still flag the now-hidden fields as invalid, but the user has no way to "correct" them.
I can work around this from the validation side, but I'm thinking, is there any reason to keep the .fields
around once an element is removed? What if we just remove it, or replace it with the hidden 'destroy' input if there is one?
The current implementation (view_helper.rb:4) reverse merges :builder => NestedForm::Builder
into the args passed to form_for. This is problematic in a project which has set a custom form builder using ActionView::Base.default_form_builder
which appears to be the suggested method for customizing builder behavior. The project's custom form builder will not appear in the nested_form_for arguments and therefore NestedForm::Builder
will be used instead leaving the project's custom builders unavailable.
It would be nice if nested_form had better support for custom form builders but I'm not sure what form that should take.
We could remove the reverse_merge and require that projects using nested_form specify NestedForm::Builder
or a subclass as their default_form_builder
. I think this is closer to the suggested pattern for customizing form_builder but extra work for every nested_form user.
Alternatively we could reopen ActionView::Helpers::FormBuilder
and mix in the methods in NestedForm::Builder
but those methods shouldn't really be available in every form_for
.
What do you think the right approach would be to allow a project to add custom form helpers which should be available within both form_for
and nested_form_for
?
Hi Ryan !
I liked very much you gem, all works as a charm. But I wonder if it is possible to generate/add more than 1 nested textfield at a time. For example, as for the screencast 197, I'd like to add 3 questions with 3 answers, not one by one. Is it possible to pass a counter value somehow to the helper method you used?
Thanks in advance.
Quikly. When I have in my model:
accepts_nested_attributes_for :foofoo, :allow_destroy => true, :limit => 2
When I do the next I get the error. But it shouldn't show because only one FooFoo is submiting and the limit is 2. Althought I delete the FooFoo, when I overcome the limit, althought I delete the rest before of submit the form, I get the error.
Add FooFoo x 3
Delete FooFoo x 2
Submit Form
Any help?
The hidden fields are being validated by the parameter (required = "required") in HTML5.
could remove the parameter when the field is hidden !
Thank's
Made a pull request, but worked only halfway - I've got my branch, didnt create a request here.
I'm using the latest git version of nested_form, rails 3.1 RC4, ruby 1.9.2, simple_form and haml. The problem I have is that it fails to create a new row when using partials in a form. This works:
= simple_nested_form_for @query, :url => perform_query_url(@query) do |f|
= f.input :string, :label => false
= f.simple_fields_for :search_attributes do |fi|
.filter
= fi.input :value
= fi.link_to_remove "Remove filter"
= f.link_to_add "Add filter", :search_attributes
= f.submit 'Save'
However, empty divs are created when I move the fields to a partial, like this:
# new.html.haml
= simple_nested_form_for @query, :url => perform_query_url(@query) do |f|
= render 'fields', :f => f
= f.submit 'Save'
# _fields.html.haml
= f.input :string, :label => false
= f.simple_fields_for :search_attributes do |fi|
.filter
= fi.input :value
= fi.link_to_remove "Remove filter"
= f.link_to_add "Add filter", :search_attributes
I noticed that in the last case, the 'link_to_add' link is placed outside of the 'fields' div, while it is inside the fields div in the first case. This is probably the reason why the javascript inserts empty divs. Note that row deletion works fine.
Hi,
I have a "Trip" model with return trip and stops like:
Class Trip < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :return_trip, :class_name=> "Trip", :foreign_key => "return_trip_id"
has_many :stops
accepts_nested_attributes_for :return_trip
accepts_nested_attributes_for :stops, :allow_destroy => true
In the form I have:
nested_form_for @trip do |f|
f.fields_for :stops do |stop_form|
...
end
f.fields_for :return_trip do |return_from|
return_form.fields_for :stops do |return_stops_form|
....
end
end
end
All works fine but the return stops are associated with the original @trip and not with the return_trip.
I don't known if what I'm trying can be done or not.
Thanks
Hello,
this is more a concern than an issue.
I'm wondering what happens if the ID generated by:
var new_id = new Date().getTime();
content = content.replace(regexp, new_id);
end up being an existing record id in the DB. Wouldn't it be mistakenly erased by this new record?
I'm having trouble using nested_form with STI.
I want to add attachments to discussion as well as posts. I tried several attempts to make it work but always got exceptions.
Do i need to add accepts_nested_attributes_for in discussion.rb ? and has_many :attachments, :dependent => :destroy ?
Do i need to add a type column in the attachments table and make it polymorphic?
class Post < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :attachments, :dependent => :destroy accepts_nested_attributes_for :attachments, :reject_if => lambda { |a| a[:url].blank? }, :allow_destroy => true end
class Discussion < Post acts_as_nested_set end
class Attachment < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :post end
The way in which the 'link_to_add' helper is used in the example led to a small issue. The nested_form.js file has this on line #34:
$(this).parent().before(content);
This will insert a new child properly.
However, if you are updating an existing parent model that already has a child defined, and you add another child, this added the new fields above the existing child records.
Wrapping the 'add' link in another element fixed this. So, instead of:
<% f.fields_for :tasks do |task_form| %>
<%= task_form.text_field :name %>
<%= task_form.link_to_remove "Remove this task" %>
<% end %>
<%= f.link_to_add "Add a task", :tasks %>
Use:
<% f.fields_for :tasks do |task_form| %>
<%= task_form.text_field :name %>
<%= task_form.link_to_remove "Remove this task" %>
<% end %>
<%= f.link_to_add "Add a task", :tasks %>
Cheers.
It would be nice if we could choose instead of the fields are within DIVS, they are within
Thank's
I'm using nested_form for a situation where:
Parent (climb) ==has_one==> Join Model (route_ascent) ==polymorphic has_many==> Children (route_step)
So I have a climb object that looks like
class Climb < ActiveRecord::Base
has_one :route_ascent
accepts_nested_attributes_for :route_ascent
end
Here's RouteAscent
class RouteAscent < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :ascent_steps, :class_name => 'RouteStep', :as => :steppable
accepts_nested_attributes_for :ascent_steps, :allow_destroy => true
end
And Here's RouteStep
class RouteStep < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :steppable, :polymorphic => true
end
In my Climb form I have
f.fields_for :route_ascent
My _route_ascent_fields partial is simply
<%= f.fields_for :ascent_steps %>
<p><%= f.link_to_add "Add A Step", :ascent_steps %></p>
And my _ascent_step_fields partial is
<div class="field">
<%= f.label :order %>
<%= f.text_field :position %><br>
<%= f.label :description %>
<%= f.text_area :description %>
<%= f.link_to_remove "Remove Step" %>
</div>
The problem I have is that whenever I submit the form with more than one object in the join model's has_many association, I get an unknown attribute error. Here's what the parameters look like that are generated by the form in such a case:
"route_ascent_attributes"=>{"ascent_steps_attributes"=>{"0"=>{"position"=>"1",
"description"=>"this will also work",
"_destroy"=>"false",
"id"=>"66"}},
"0"=>{"new_1307386880995"=>{"position"=>"2",
"description"=>"broken!",
"_destroy"=>"false"}},
"id"=>"4"},
It looks like the second object is not being included correctly in the parameters, but I haven't been able to figure out why this is so.
The problem occurs whether or not the has_many association starts out with an object or not. So If it is empty, I can successfully create a single object but not two. If It already has one object, I can't add a second without getting this error.
Will continue to work on this, but I'd appreciate any insight as to what the problem might be!
after_create
after_update
after_update
before_save
before_update
before_create
In Model, i want to calculate the collection of price fields. but when the field is deleted it is still in the model.
Thank's
module NestedForm
class Builder
def fields_for_with_nested_attributes(association_name, association, options, block)
block ||= Proc.new { |fields| @template.render(:partial => "#{association_name.to_s.singularize}_fields", :locals => {:f => fields}) }
@fields ||= {}
@fields[association_name] = block
super(association_name, association, options, block)
end
end
end
Hello!
The Made by DNA link doesn't work. I think the page moved? Did you mean this page?
http://blog.madebydna.com/all/code/2010/10/07/dynamic-nested-froms-with-the-nested-form-gem.html
After updating haml from 3.1.1 to 3.1.2
link_to_add
does not work anymore in the sense, that the hidden blueprint for the nested form fields is not in the source as it should be.
I was trying to get this working with the rails_xss plugin (http://github.com/NZKoz/rails_xss), but failed so far. Maybe you can help me out.
I think the main issue is, that we should not use @template.concat but use the tag or content_tag helpers. (see also http://github.com/NZKoz/rails_xss/issues#issue/6)
One thing i had to do was require the xss pluging before nested_form plugin (in environment.rb: config.plugins = [ :rails_xss, :all ]).
When I create a record with nested attributes, the nested attributes tend to be created in a seemingly random manner- I added each nested field in order, and filled them with values from 1-5. However, it gets created in a random order: => 5 3 1 2 4. It's different every time.
So then when I go edit, the form displays the fields in that order as well.. which the user might find confusing.
Is there a way to let it create the records from top to bottom?
This should be useful in most cases but I was trying to use this with a ul element. Can an option be provided to toggle this behavior on and off?
Hi Ryan,
when I'm using multiple forms on the same object (e.g. two instances of nested_form_for(@user)), each of which have nested fields for a different association, the blueprint for the first is inserted after all these forms instead of just the first. It's not a big issue - the forms all work - but it's unnecessary code and it makes the markup invalid due to reused div ids.
I can fix this simply by changing
@associations ||=| []
@after_nested_form_callbacks ||= []
to
@associations = []
@after_nested_form_callbacks = []
in view_helper.rb, thereby not keeping track of previous associations and callbacks, but I'm sure that's breaking something else.
And yes, I know I could just use one form, but this is for inline editing and I want to send only the bare minimum to the server, so I'm splitting it out into several forms.
Any ideas?
The fix proposed in #19 is not complete:
Actually there is still a bug regarding this scenario:
In a Root embeds_one Child embeds_many DeepChild, the name of a deeply nested field would be:
root[child_attributes][deep_child_attributes][0][attribute]
The javascript code responsible to fill the blueprint's parent's ids is broken, since it is always expecting an index after an /[a-z]+attributes/g ex:
root[child_attributes][0][deep_child_attributes][0][attribute]
Thanks for all your work Ryan, it is much appreciated.
After implementing nested_form in Rails 3 I have all of the markup being treated as text to be displayed in the browser rather than mark up.
I have followed Ryan's Railscasts and also the Reports/Links example but I still get the same effect.
Snippet from source:
New project
<div id="tasks_fields_blueprint" style="display: none"><div class="fields"></div></div> Back
I wonder whether this is to do with the Rails 3 View alteration whereby all output is escaped save for that wrapped in the raw() function?
http://edgeguides.rubyonrails.org/3_0_release_notes.html#other-changes
My Rails skills are not yet sufficient to be able to prove that this is the cause of the problem or, if it is, how to remedy it.
Anyone having a similar issue?
I'm not sure if I should post it here or at client_side_validations's Issues, but both aren't 100% compatible with each other.
I'm getting various js errors when validations should run.
This is just notifying the problem right now, I'll post more info (and see if I might be able to fix it) as soon as I'm back on that part of this current project.
Hi, I'm using nested_form and jquery-rails (https://github.com/indirect/jquery-rails) but it's not working for me
This is my form:
<%= nested_form_for(@project, :html => {:multipart => true}) do |f| %>
Project Name:
<%= f.text_field :name %>
What do you want us to build for you?
<%= f.text_area :description %>
<%= f.fields_for :images do |image_task| %>
Upload:
<%= image_task.file_field :file %>
<% end %>
<%= f.link_to_add "Add a image", :images %>
<%= f.submit %>
<% end %>
Here's a skeletal example. Model relations:
User has_many :projects
Project has_many :tasks
Simple form:
= nested_form_for(@user) do |f|
.projects
= f.fields_for :projects do |pf|
.tasks
= pf.fields_for :tasks do |tf|
= tf.text_field :description
= tf.link_to_remove 'Remove this task'
= pf.link_to_add 'Add a task', :tasks
= pf.link_to_remove 'Remove this project'
= f.link_to_add 'Add a project', :projects
= f.submit
If you click 'Add a project' and then 'Add a task', you'll get an input with a name like user[projects_attributes][new_1306716504432][tasks_attributes][new_1306716506218][description]
. If you click 'Add a task' again, you'll get another input with exactly the same name.
The IDs won't be exact duplicates. The first and second IDs in this test run were:
user_projects_attributes_new_1306716504432_projects_tasks_attributes_new_1306716506218_description
user_projects_attributes_new_1306716504432_projects_tasks_attributes_new_1306716506218_tasks_description
I think the problem is this line in nested_form.js
:
var context = ($(this).closest('.fields').find('input:first').attr('name') || '').replace(new RegExp('\[[a-z]+\]$'), '');
If I had a text field for the project name before the nested tasks, then input:first
would be the project name, and the context would be the project. But I don't, and so input:first
is the hidden "destroy project" input. But the second time I add a task, input:first
is the description field for the first project.
It may also be that this line is fine, and the subsequent code is trying to be smart about handling a context that could be either "the surrounding object" or "an existing sibling of the new object", but getting it wrong. I haven't dug into that code yet.
If I change the selector from input:first
to input:last
, it works for me, because it always picks up the "destroy project" input. But if the "Remove this project" link were above the tasks instead of below it, it would break the same way it's breaking for me now.
I guess another workaround is just to put the remove link above the associations. But unfortunately in my real use case, there is no remove link, and the context seizes on some other input. I suspect there's just an inherent brittleness to this method of using existing inputs to figure out context.
I'm using the master branch at 89953fa.
I have a slightly unusual requirement that means I need to respect acts_as_list positions when adding/removing nested models.
class Journey < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :legs, :dependent => :destroy
accepts_nested_attributes_for :legs, :allow_destroy => true
end
class Leg < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :journey
acts_as_list :scope => :journey
end
I don't think this is that odd - the legs of my journey have a destination, and the order of them determines the start and end points.
Of course, this means I can't use the standard helpers of f.link_to_add and f.link_to_remove as these are form level helpers, and I want a helper to sit with the nested form. I can handle the JS to update positions of subsequent legs no problem, but I was wondering if there was an established way of doing this already, or whether I need to fork, build new helpers and then issue a pull request? I was thinking something like being able to do a:
<%= f.link_to_add_inline "Add leg", :legs, :after => current_leg.position %>
Thoughts?
Hi there!
Don't know the reason, but the gem jquery it's not working properly. It let's me add an object dynamically to the form, but the problem is on the link_to_remove function. It let's me delete the objects if I click on the link and then submit the form. But they are not hiding.
This only happens on the previous saved objects, not on the recently added on the form using "link_to_add" function.
I'm using rails 3.0.9 and jQuery 1.6.1
Here is the pastie of the models and the view
http://pastie.org/2214259
When I include the link_to_add method in my nested_form_for block, I get a Missing Block error. Here's the relevant part of my template:
<%= nested_form_for group do |form| %>
<%= form.label :name, "Name" %>
<%= form.text_field :name, :class => "text-input" %>
<%= form.fields_for :habitats do |ff| %>
<%= content_tag :div, :class => "fields" do %>
<%= ff.text_field :name, :class => "text-input" %>
<%= ff.link_to_remove "Remove Habitat" %>
<% end %>
<% end %>
<%= form.link_to_add "Add Habitat", :habitats%>
<% end %>
The error is tied to the first line of the above code, but it only occurs when I include the link_to_add line (second to last). Here's the trace:
actionpack (3.0.5) lib/action_view/helpers/form_helper.rb:531:in `fields_for' actionpack (3.0.5) lib/action_view/helpers/form_helper.rb:1175:in `fields_for' nested_form (0.1.0) lib/nested_form/builder.rb:8:in `link_to_add' nested_form (0.1.0) lib/nested_form/view_helper.rb:8:in `call' nested_form (0.1.0) lib/nested_form/view_helper.rb:8:in `nested_form_for' nested_form (0.1.0) lib/nested_form/view_helper.rb:7:in `map' nested_form (0.1.0) lib/nested_form/view_helper.rb:7:in `nested_form_for'
I've looked at the actionpack and nested_form source involved here, but I can't see the problem.
the regex in nested_form.js which is supposed to inject the parent_ids[i] didnt work for me. hence everyhing got attached to the first parent only.
I tested it on railscast #196 + #197 and it put all answers under question 1, even if you created them under other questions.
the version I arrived at is http://gist.github.com/393861
not sure why yours didn't work for me, though.
:(.
Bharat
I'm developing an app that is very similar to the survey example from your railscast. What I have so far in my models:
class Center < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :experiments, :order => 'id DESC', :dependent => :destroy
accepts_nested_attributes_for :experiments, :reject_if => :all_blank, :allow_destroy => true
... (more code for thinking sphinx)
//
class Experiment < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :center
has_many :datatypes, :dependent => :destroy
accepts_nested_attributes_for :datatypes, :reject_if => :all_blank, :allow_destroy => true
has_many :personnels, :dependent => :destroy
accepts_nested_attributes_for :personnels, :reject_if => :all_blank, :allow_destroy => true
//
class Personnel < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :experiment
//
class Datatype < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :experiment
The issue I'm seeing is that when I click the link to add a new experiment in my form (the views follow the same practices as the examples you outlined, using fields_for and partials for each model), and then add personnel and datatypes to that new experiment, their child attributes (personnels and datatypes) are added to the first experiment, not the new one. An inspection of the personnels_attributes_blueprint revealed this: center[experiments_attributes][0][personnels_attributes][new_personnels]
Instead of what it SHOULD be:
center[experiments_attributes][new_experiments][personnels_attributes][new_personnels]
Instead of [new_experiments], I get the ID of the existing experiment. Can anyone think of a cause for this? I'm running Rails 3.0.6 on top of Ruby 1.8.7 and using nested_form 0.1.0. Thanks - I'm totally stuck and on a deadline for this week...
As mentioned in the docs, it should be possible to do this.
<= f.fields_for :tasks %>
And have it automatically look for a task_fields
partial and render that for each task.
Is it possible to identify the newly added field from a nested:fieldAdded event?
I want to place my image into dynamic sidebar while adding or editing my parent model. The image form shown in sidebar but "link_to_add" and "link_to_remove" helpers doesn't work when I use <% yield :sidebar %> in application layout
I'm not strong in JavaScript, please help me somebody
# recipes/image_fields.html.erb <% content_for :sidebar do %> <%= f.fields_for :photos do |img| %> field here <% end %> <p><%= f.link_to_add image_tag("add_button.png"), :photos %></p> <% end %>
This isn't so much a problem with a code as it is outdated information.
<%= task_form.link_to_remove %>
This fails since it expects an argument, which I found you could pass a string which becomes the content for the link (this makes sense).
Love the plugin.
Hello, I get a Missing Block error when I try to use nested_form_for instead of form_for
<% nested_form_for @project, :html => { :multipart => true } do |f| %>
The most wired thing is that it happens when I try to submit something that is not valid and not when I first render the "new" action.
I've worked all day long with the plugin. It worked perfectly with html.erb files. Changed to Haml and everything rendered fine but the add link doesnt work.
Check the generated code in html.erb after comes the blueprint div with the reference code. That div is empty if I use Haml.
I think the problem is in link_to_add inside the builder around here
@template.concat(%Q[
Tried without success to put a debugger and run the fields_for to see what was generated. Seems like because of the way HAMLS renders this fields_for returns nothing when called. Maybe because it's already past the end of the form since there if no explicit <%end%> in HAML.
Solved the problem removing Haml in the parts where de add link appears in something like this:
<% nested_form_for [@Portfolio, project], :html => {:multipart => true} do |f| %>
<%= render :partial => 'projects/globals_form', :locals => { :f => f } %>
<% #This render will show once for every asset automatically
f.fields_for :asset do |a| %>
<%= render :partial => 'projects/assetsform', :locals => { :a => a }%>
<% end %>
<p style="clear: both"> <%= f.link_to_add "Add a new Asset", :assets %> </p>
<p style="clear: both"> <%= f.submit 'Update'%> </p>
<%end%>
Those partials are written in HAML but the add link must be inside the html.erb. Sorry, I tried to solve the issue but if you know what to do next do would be really useful.
A declarative, efficient, and flexible JavaScript library for building user interfaces.
๐ Vue.js is a progressive, incrementally-adoptable JavaScript framework for building UI on the web.
TypeScript is a superset of JavaScript that compiles to clean JavaScript output.
An Open Source Machine Learning Framework for Everyone
The Web framework for perfectionists with deadlines.
A PHP framework for web artisans
Bring data to life with SVG, Canvas and HTML. ๐๐๐
JavaScript (JS) is a lightweight interpreted programming language with first-class functions.
Some thing interesting about web. New door for the world.
A server is a program made to process requests and deliver data to clients.
Machine learning is a way of modeling and interpreting data that allows a piece of software to respond intelligently.
Some thing interesting about visualization, use data art
Some thing interesting about game, make everyone happy.
We are working to build community through open source technology. NB: members must have two-factor auth.
Open source projects and samples from Microsoft.
Google โค๏ธ Open Source for everyone.
Alibaba Open Source for everyone
Data-Driven Documents codes.
China tencent open source team.