Support for sbt 0.11.3?

[twitter]

Support for sbt 0.11.3?

[robey]

In the meantime, sbt has actually moved to version 0.12.0. As is usual with sbt, none of these versions are compatible with each other, which invalidates the hard work people put into making the previous versions work well.

Twitter moved to a maven-based build system. Scrooge could use that, but only if Twitter open-sources it. (Maven isn't really much better than sbt, but it doesn't break every few months, which is a huge advantage in this case.)

I'm +1 on any patch which updates sbt-package-dist to work with today's version of sbt, or any patch that removes scrooge's dependency on sbt-package-dist. I don't think scrooge is using much of it, and it could probably use a simple Makefile, if anyone is willing to do that work.

[ryanking]

All of the twitter maven plugins are open source.

On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Robey Pointer [email protected]:

In the meantime, sbt has actually moved to version 0.12.0. As is usual
with sbt, none of these versions are compatible with each other, which
invalidates the hard work people put into making the previous versions work
well.

Twitter moved to a maven-based build system. Scrooge could use that, but
only if Twitter open-sources it. (Maven isn't really much better than sbt,
but it doesn't break every few months, which is a huge advantage in this
case.)

I'm +1 on any patch which updates sbt-package-dist to work with today's
version of sbt, or any patch that removes scrooge's dependency on
sbt-package-dist. I don't think scrooge is using much of it, and it could
probably use a simple Makefile, if anyone is willing to do that work.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/16#issuecomment-8100690.

[stevegury]

Migrating the code of sbt-package-dist and sbt-scrooge to sbt 0.11.3 is easy, we just need to publish a new release.

[nshkrob]

Scrooge is using 0.13.5 now. Closing this.