Interface suffix

[php-http]

Interface suffix

[Nyholm]

I believe it is a PSR standard from the beginning. But I believe we should follow every Symfony best practice for public bundles.

👍

[sagikazarmark]

No, it is NOT PSR. Everyone believes that it is, but it isn't. It is an INTERNAL bylaw for the FIG, but thank god, it hasn't been standardized.

Symfony supports this Interface suffix practice in fact, but so far, I haven't been convinced that it is good, quite the opposite acually.

My most linked blog post by @mathiasverraes: http://verraes.net/2013/09/sensible-interfaces/

[Nyholm]

No, it is NOT PSR. Everyone believes that it is, but it isn't. It is an INTERNAL bylaw for the FIG, but thank god, it hasn't been standardized.

Sorry, I miss-spoke. It is not a coding standard but as you say, PHP-fig apply Interface and Trait suffix and Abstract prefix.

Thank you for the link.

[dbu]

not sure why fig is doing the suffixes. its indeed common throughout symfony, but in php-http we don't do it and i see the reasons not to do the suffixes. i don't mind much either way. we can change it if people think that is better.

[sagikazarmark]

I don't insist on this one. If we decide to follow symfony standards, let's keep the suffix. If not, drop it.

[dbu]

i really don't know which is better / less confusing.

[joelwurtz]

I think it's more a matter of: should we be consistent for the dependencies, or on the organisation itself ?

For me i would like to keep the same rules across php-http packages, but i don't mind having Interface or not in the name, only detail to my eyes.

[Nyholm]

@joelwurtz makes a great point. Lets be coherent with php-http.

[dbu]

okay. who does the pull request?

[sagikazarmark]

I will in the evening.